Sparsification via Compressed Sensing for Automatic Speech Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In order to achieve high accuracy for machine learning (ML) applications, it is essential to employ models with a large number of parameters. Certain applications, such as Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), however, require real-time interactions with users, hence compelling the model to have as low latency as possible. Deploying large scale ML applications thus necessitates model quantization and compression, especially when running ML models on resource constrained devices. For example, by forcing some of the model weight values into zero, it is possible to apply zero-weight compression, which reduces both the model size and model reading time from the memory. In the literature, such methods are referred to as sparse pruning. The fundamental questions are when and which weights should be forced to zero, i.e. be pruned. In this work, we propose a compressed sensing based pruning (CSP) approach to effectively address those questions. By reformulating sparse pruning as a sparsity inducing and compression-error reduction dual problem, we introduce the classic compressed sensing process into the ML model training process. Using ASR task as an example, we show that CSP consistently outperforms existing approaches in the literature.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2021.
Builds on
9 of 19 references.
References · 9
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
- 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 583
- 2015Listen, Attend and Spellcited by 543
- 2017Exploring Sparsity in Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 75
- 2020Streaming End-to-End Bilingual ASR Systems with Joint Language Identificationcited by 20
- 2017Image Compression Based on Compressive Sensing: End-to-End Comparison with JPEGcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2021Knowledge Distillation for Neural Transducers from Large Self-Supervised Pre-trained Modelscited by 15
- 2021CoDERT: Distilling Encoder Representations with Co-learning for Transducer-based Speech Recognitioncited by 11
- 2022Sub-8-Bit Quantization Aware Training for 8-Bit Neural Network Accelerator with On-Device Speech Recognitioncited by 5
- 2022Representative Subset Selection for Efficient Fine-Tuning in Self-Supervised Speech Recognitioncited by 1
- 2025An Effective Training Framework for Light-Weight Automatic Speech Recognition Modelscited by 1
- 2023Accelerator-Aware Training for Transducer-Based Speech Recognitioncited by 0
- 2023Neural Language Model Pruning for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 0
- 2025Gibbs randomness-compression propositioncited by 0
- 2025Gibbs randomness-compression proposition29 May 2025
- 2025An Effective Training Framework for Light-Weight Automatic Speech Recognition Models22 May 2025
- 2023Neural Language Model Pruning for Automatic Speech Recognition5 Oct 2023
- 2023Accelerator-Aware Training for Transducer-Based Speech Recognition12 May 2023
- 2022Sub-8-Bit Quantization Aware Training for 8-Bit Neural Network Accelerator with On-Device Speech Recognition30 Jun 2022
- 2022Representative Subset Selection for Efficient Fine-Tuning in Self-Supervised Speech Recognition18 Mar 2022
- 2021Knowledge Distillation for Neural Transducers from Large Self-Supervised Pre-trained Models7 Oct 2021
- 2021CoDERT: Distilling Encoder Representations with Co-learning for Transducer-based Speech Recognition14 Jun 2021
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Accurate and Structured Pruning for Efficient Automatic Speech Recognition
- 2025Hybrid Pruning: In-Situ Compression of Self-Supervised Speech Models for Speaker Verification and Anti-Spoofing
- 2021Weight, Block or Unit? Exploring Sparsity Tradeoffs for Speech Enhancement on Tiny Neural Accelerators
- 2025Choose Your Model Size: Any Compression of Large Language Models Without Re-Computation
- 2021Prune Once for All: Sparse Pre-Trained Language Models
- 2023Accurate Neural Network Pruning Requires Rethinking Sparse Optimization
- 2022Is Smaller Always Faster? Tradeoffs in Compressing Self-Supervised Speech Transformers
- 2024Aggressive Post-Training Compression on Extremely Large Language Models