mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Computation Complexity of True Proof Number Search

arXiv 2102.04907 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2021cs.CC cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We point out that the computation of true proof and disproof numbers for proof number search in arbitrary directed acyclic graphs is NP-hard, an important theoretical result for proof number search. The proof requires a reduction from SAT, which demonstrates that finding true proof/disproof number for arbitrary DAG is at least as hard as deciding if arbitrary SAT instance is satisfiable, thus NP-hard.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2021.

Builds on

0 of 38 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.