Statistically Profiling Biases in Natural Language Reasoning Datasets and Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent work has indicated that many natural language understanding and reasoning datasets contain statistical cues that may be taken advantaged of by NLP models whose capability may thus be grossly overestimated. To discover the potential weakness in the models, some human-designed stress tests have been proposed but they are expensive to create and do not generalize to arbitrary models. We propose a light-weight and general statistical profiling framework, ICQ (I-See-Cue), which automatically identifies possible biases in any multiple-choice NLU datasets without the need to create any additional test cases, and further evaluates through blackbox testing the extent to which models may exploit these biases.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2021.
Builds on
26 of 38 references.
References · 26
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
- 2016A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Storiescited by 413
14 more
- 2018SWAG: A Large-Scale Adversarial Dataset for Grounded Commonsense Inferencecited by 333
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
- 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
- 2018Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inferencecited by 211
- 2020ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoningcited by 211
- 2016Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inferencecited by 199
- 2020Adversarial Filters of Dataset Biasescited by 159
- 2019Towards Debiasing Fact Verification Modelscited by 143
- 2019Unlearn Dataset Bias in Natural Language Inference by Fitting the Residualcited by 119
- 2017The Argument Reasoning Comprehension Task: Identification and Reconstruction of Implicit Warrantscited by 55
- 2018Behavior Analysis of NLI Models: Uncovering the Influence of Three Factors on Robustnesscited by 17
- 2018A Simple and Effective Approach to the Story Cloze Testcited by 10
- 2019Increasing Robustness to Spurious Correlations using Forgettable Examplescited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.