mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning-augmented count-min sketches via Bayesian nonparametrics

arXiv 2102.04462 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2021stat.ML cs.LG math.STcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The count-min sketch (CMS) is a time and memory efficient randomized data structure that provides estimates of tokens' frequencies in a data stream of tokens, i.e. point queries, based on random hashed data. A learning-augmented version of the CMS, referred to as CMS-DP, has been proposed by Cai, Mitzenmacher and Adams (textitNeurIPS 2018), and it relies on Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) modeling of the data stream of tokens via a Dirichlet process (DP) prior, with estimates of a point query being obtained as suitable mean functionals of the posterior distribution of the point query, given the hashed data. While the CMS-DP has proved to improve on some aspects of CMS, it has the major drawback of arising from a ``constructive" proof that builds upon arguments tailored to the DP prior, namely arguments that are not usable for other nonparametric priors. In this paper, we present a ``Bayesian" proof of the CMS-DP that has the main advantage of building upon arguments that are usable, in principle, within a broad class of nonparametric priors arising from normalized completely random measures. This result leads to develop a novel learning-augmented CMS under power-law data streams, referred to as CMS-PYP, which relies on BNP modeling of the data stream of tokens via a Pitman-Yor process (PYP) prior. Under this more general framework, we apply the arguments of the ``Bayesian" proof of the CMS-DP, suitably adapted to the PYP prior, in order to compute the posterior distribution of a point query, given the hashed data. Applications to synthetic data and real textual data show that the CMS-PYP outperforms the CMS and the CMS-DP in estimating low-frequency tokens, which are known to be of critical interest in textual data, and it is competitive with respect to a variation of the CMS designed for low-frequency tokens. An extension of our BNP approach to more general queries is also discussed.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2021.

Builds on

8 of 74 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017Constrained Bayesian Optimization with Noisy Experimentscited by 103
  2. 2015Are Gibbs-type priors the most natural generalization of the Dirichlet process?cited by 10
  3. 2019(Learned) Frequency Estimation Algorithms under Zipfian Distributioncited by 10
  4. 2013Origins of power-law degree distribution in the heterogeneity of human activity in social networkscited by 9
  5. 2013The dynamics of correlated noveltiescited by 7
  6. 2015Count-Min-Log sketch: Approximately counting with approximate counterscited by 6
  7. 2018Count-Min: Optimal Estimation and Tight Error Bounds using Empirical Error Distributionscited by 5
  8. 2021A Bayesian nonparametric approach to count-min sketch under power-law data streamscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.