Simultaneous Localization and Mapping Related Datasets: A Comprehensive Survey
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Due to the complicated procedure and costly hardware, Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) has been heavily dependent on public datasets for drill and evaluation, leading to many impressive demos and good benchmark scores. However, with a huge contrast, SLAM is still struggling on the way towards mature deployment, which sounds a warning: some of the datasets are overexposed, causing biased usage and evaluation. This raises the problem on how to comprehensively access the existing datasets and correctly select them. Moreover, limitations do exist in current datasets, then how to build new ones and which directions to go? Nevertheless, a comprehensive survey which can tackle the above issues does not exist yet, while urgently demanded by the community. To fill the gap, this paper strives to cover a range of cohesive topics about SLAM related datasets, including general collection methodology and fundamental characteristic dimensions, SLAM related tasks taxonomy and datasets categorization, introduction of state-of-the-arts, overview and comparison of existing datasets, review of evaluation criteria, and analyses and discussions about current limitations and future directions, looking forward to not only guiding the dataset selection, but also promoting the dataset research.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024How NeRFs and 3D Gaussian Splatting are Reshaping SLAM: a Surveycited by 72
- 2022Multi-sensor large-scale dataset for multi-view 3D reconstructioncited by 14
- 2022Semantic Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: A Surveycited by 7
- 2022Are We Ready for Robust and Resilient SLAM? A Framework For Quantitative Characterization of SLAM Datasetscited by 3
- 2023The LuViRA Dataset: Synchronized Vision, Radio, and Audio Sensors for Indoor Localizationcited by 2
- 2025Reproducible Evaluation of Camera Auto-Exposure Methods in the Field: Platform, Benchmark and Lessons Learnedcited by 1
- 2022Optimizing SLAM Evaluation Footprint Through Dynamic Range Coverage Analysis of Datasetscited by 0
- 2023LuViRA Dataset Validation and Discussion: Comparing Vision, Radio, and Audio Sensors for Indoor Localizationcited by 0
- 2024Lost in Tracking Translation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Visual SLAM in Human-Centered XR and IoT Ecosystemscited by 0
- 2025Reproducible Evaluation of Camera Auto-Exposure Methods in the Field: Platform, Benchmark and Lessons Learned19 Jun 2025
- 2024Lost in Tracking Translation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Visual SLAM in Human-Centered XR and IoT Ecosystems11 Nov 2024
- 2024How NeRFs and 3D Gaussian Splatting are Reshaping SLAM: a Survey20 Feb 2024
- 2023LuViRA Dataset Validation and Discussion: Comparing Vision, Radio, and Audio Sensors for Indoor Localization6 Sep 2023
- 2023The LuViRA Dataset: Synchronized Vision, Radio, and Audio Sensors for Indoor Localization10 Feb 2023
- 2022Semantic Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: A Survey14 Sep 2022
- 2022Optimizing SLAM Evaluation Footprint Through Dynamic Range Coverage Analysis of Datasets13 Sep 2022
- 2022Multi-sensor large-scale dataset for multi-view 3D reconstruction11 Mar 2022
- 2022Are We Ready for Robust and Resilient SLAM? A Framework For Quantitative Characterization of SLAM Datasets23 Feb 2022