Invertible Neural Networks versus MCMC for Posterior Reconstruction in Grazing Incidence X-Ray Fluorescence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Grazing incidence X-ray fluorescence is a non-destructive technique for analyzing the geometry and compositional parameters of nanostructures appearing e.g. in computer chips. In this paper, we propose to reconstruct the posterior parameter distribution given a noisy measurement generated by the forward model by an appropriately learned invertible neural network. This network resembles the transport map from a reference distribution to the posterior. We demonstrate by numerical comparisons that our method can compete with established Markov Chain Monte Carlo approaches, while being more efficient and flexible in applications.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2021.
Builds on
7 of 18 references.
References · 7
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
- 2018Analyzing Inverse Problems with Invertible Neural Networkscited by 239
- 2019HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian Inferencecited by 31
- 2020Stabilizing Invertible Neural Networks Using Mixture Modelscited by 30
- 2021Preconditioned training of normalizing flows for variational inference in inverse problemscited by 19
- 2020Parameterizing uncertainty by deep invertible networks, an application to reservoir characterizationcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
12 papers.
- 2021Stochastic Normalizing Flows for Inverse Problems: a Markov Chains Viewpointcited by 32
- 2022Reliable amortized variational inference with physics-based latent distribution correctioncited by 25
- 2021Generalized Normalizing Flows via Markov Chainscited by 23
- 2024Wasserstein Gradient Flows for Moreau Envelopes of f-Divergences in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spacescited by 15
- 2023Conditional Generative Models are Provably Robust: Pointwise Guarantees for Bayesian Inverse Problemscited by 12
- 2022WPPNets and WPPFlows: The Power of Wasserstein Patch Priors for Superresolutioncited by 10
- 2023Learning from small data sets: Patch-based regularizers in inverse problems for image reconstructioncited by 9
- 2024Importance Corrected Neural JKO Samplingcited by 7
- 2025Accelerated Stein Variational Gradient Flowcited by 5
- 2025Towards understanding Accelerated Stein Variational Gradient Flow -- Analysis of Generalized Bilinear Kernels for Gaussian target distributionscited by 2
- 2024Mixed Noise and Posterior Estimation with Conditional DeepGEMcited by 1
- 2023Posterior Estimation Using Deep Learning: A Simulation Study of Compartmental Modeling in Dynamic PETcited by 0
- 2025Towards understanding Accelerated Stein Variational Gradient Flow -- Analysis of Generalized Bilinear Kernels for Gaussian target distributions4 Sep 2025
- 2025Accelerated Stein Variational Gradient Flow30 Mar 2025
- 2024Importance Corrected Neural JKO Sampling29 Jul 2024
- 2024Wasserstein Gradient Flows for Moreau Envelopes of f-Divergences in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces7 Feb 2024
- 2024Mixed Noise and Posterior Estimation with Conditional DeepGEM5 Feb 2024
- 2023Learning from small data sets: Patch-based regularizers in inverse problems for image reconstruction27 Dec 2023
- 2023Conditional Generative Models are Provably Robust: Pointwise Guarantees for Bayesian Inverse Problems28 Mar 2023
- 2023Posterior Estimation Using Deep Learning: A Simulation Study of Compartmental Modeling in Dynamic PET17 Mar 2023
- 2022Reliable amortized variational inference with physics-based latent distribution correction24 Jul 2022
- 2022WPPNets and WPPFlows: The Power of Wasserstein Patch Priors for Superresolution20 Jan 2022
- 2021Generalized Normalizing Flows via Markov Chains24 Nov 2021
- 2021Stochastic Normalizing Flows for Inverse Problems: a Markov Chains Viewpoint23 Sep 2021