mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Invertible Neural Networks versus MCMC for Posterior Reconstruction in Grazing Incidence X-Ray Fluorescence

arXiv 2102.03189 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2021cs.LG physics.data-ancited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Grazing incidence X-ray fluorescence is a non-destructive technique for analyzing the geometry and compositional parameters of nanostructures appearing e.g. in computer chips. In this paper, we propose to reconstruct the posterior parameter distribution given a noisy measurement generated by the forward model by an appropriately learned invertible neural network. This network resembles the transport map from a reference distribution to the posterior. We demonstrate by numerical comparisons that our method can compete with established Markov Chain Monte Carlo approaches, while being more efficient and flexible in applications.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2021.

Builds on

7 of 18 references.

References · 7

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,029
  3. 2018Analyzing Inverse Problems with Invertible Neural Networkscited by 239
  4. 2019HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian Inferencecited by 31
  5. 2020Stabilizing Invertible Neural Networks Using Mixture Modelscited by 30
  6. 2021Preconditioned training of normalizing flows for variational inference in inverse problemscited by 19
  7. 2020Parameterizing uncertainty by deep invertible networks, an application to reservoir characterizationcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.

12 papers.