Leveraging Review Properties for Effective Recommendation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many state-of-the-art recommendation systems leverage explicit item reviews posted by users by considering their usefulness in representing the users' preferences and describing the items' attributes. These posted reviews may have various associated properties, such as their length, their age since they were posted, or their item rating. However, it remains unclear how these different review properties contribute to the usefulness of their corresponding reviews in addressing the recommendation task. In particular, users show distinct preferences when considering different aspects of the reviews (i.e. properties) for making decisions about the items. Hence, it is important to model the relationship between the reviews' properties and the usefulness of reviews while learning the users' preferences and the items' attributes. Therefore, we propose to model the reviews with their associated available properties. We introduce a novel review properties-based recommendation model (RPRM) that learns which review properties are more important than others in capturing the usefulness of reviews, thereby enhancing the recommendation results. Furthermore, inspired by the users' information adoption framework, we integrate two loss functions and a negative sampling strategy into our proposed RPRM model, to ensure that the properties of reviews are correlated with the users' preferences. We examine the effectiveness of RPRM using the well-known Yelp and Amazon datasets. Our results show that RPRM significantly outperforms a classical and five state-of-the-art baselines. Moreover, we experimentally show the advantages of using our proposed loss functions and negative sampling strategy, which further enhance the recommendation performances of RPRM.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Learning to Execute Actions or Ask Clarification Questionscited by 30
- 2023Self Contrastive Learning for Session-based Recommendationcited by 3
- 2021Review-Based Domain Disentanglement without Duplicate Users or Contexts for Cross-Domain Recommendationcited by 2
- 2025Counterfactual Inference for Eliminating Sentiment Bias in Recommender Systemscited by 2
- 2021Graphing else matters: exploiting aspect opinions and ratings in explainable graph-based recommendationscited by 0
- 2022Generating Self-Serendipity Preference in Recommender Systems for Addressing Cold Start Problemscited by 0
- 2026A Gated Hybrid Contrastive Collaborative Filtering Recommendationcited by 0
- 2026A Gated Hybrid Contrastive Collaborative Filtering Recommendation29 Apr 2026
- 2025Counterfactual Inference for Eliminating Sentiment Bias in Recommender Systems6 May 2025
- 2023Self Contrastive Learning for Session-based Recommendation2 Jun 2023
- 2022Generating Self-Serendipity Preference in Recommender Systems for Addressing Cold Start Problems27 Apr 2022
- 2022Learning to Execute Actions or Ask Clarification Questions18 Apr 2022
- 2021Review-Based Domain Disentanglement without Duplicate Users or Contexts for Cross-Domain Recommendation25 Oct 2021
- 2021Graphing else matters: exploiting aspect opinions and ratings in explainable graph-based recommendations7 Jul 2021