mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Effects of Number of Filters of Convolutional Layers on Speech Recognition Model Accuracy

arXiv 2102.02326 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2021cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Inspired by the progress of the End-to-End approach [1], this paper systematically studies the effects of Number of Filters of convolutional layers on the model prediction accuracy of CNN+RNN (Convolutional Neural Networks adding to Recurrent Neural Networks) for ASR Models (Automatic Speech Recognition). Experimental results show that only when the CNN Number of Filters exceeds a certain threshold value is adding CNN to RNN able to improve the performance of the CNN+RNN speech recognition model, otherwise some parameter ranges of CNN can render it useless to add the CNN to the RNN model. Our results show a strong dependency of word accuracy on the Number of Filters of convolutional layers. Based on the experimental results, the paper suggests a possible hypothesis of Sound-2-Vector Embedding (Convolutional Embedding) to explain the above observations. Based on this Embedding hypothesis and the optimization of parameters, the paper develops an End-to-End speech recognition system which has a high word accuracy but also has a light model-weight. The developed LVCSR (Large Vocabulary Continuous Speech Recognition) model has achieved quite a high word accuracy of 90.2% only by its Acoustic Model alone, without any assistance from intermediate phonetic representation and any Language Model. Its acoustic model contains only 4.4 million weight parameters, compared to the 35~68 million acoustic-model weight parameters in DeepSpeech2 [2] (one of the top state-of-the-art LVCSR models) which can achieve a word accuracy of 91.5%. The light-weighted model is good for improving the transcribing computing efficiency and also useful for mobile devices, Driverless Vehicles, etc. Our model weight is reduced to ~10% the size of DeepSpeech2, but our model accuracy remains close to that of DeepSpeech2. If combined with a Language Model, our LVCSR system is able to achieve 91.5% word accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2021.

Builds on

10 of 15 references.

References · 10

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  3. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  4. 2015Deep Speech 2: End-to-End Speech Recognition in English and Mandarincited by 449
  5. 2014Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognitioncited by 354
  6. 2014word2vec Parameter Learning Explainedcited by 53
  7. 2018On the Dimensionality of Word Embeddingcited by 46
  8. 2016Wav2Letter: an End-to-End ConvNet-based Speech Recognition Systemcited by 43
  9. 2017Towards End-to-End Speech Recognition with Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 24
  10. 2018Understand Functionality and Dimensionality of Vector Embeddings: the Distributional Hypothesis, the Pairwise Inner Product Loss and Its Bias-Variance Trade-offcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.