mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning to identify image manipulations in scientific publications

arXiv 2102.01874 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2021cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adherence to scientific community standards ensures objectivity, clarity, reproducibility, and helps prevent bias, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. To help scientific integrity officers and journal/publisher reviewers monitor if researchers stick with these standards, it is important to have a solid procedure to detect duplication as one of the most frequent types of manipulation in scientific papers. Images in scientific papers are used to support the experimental description and the discussion of the findings. Therefore, in this work we focus on detecting the duplications in images as one of the most important parts of a scientific paper. We propose a framework that combines image processing and deep learning methods to classify images in the articles as duplicated or unduplicated ones. We show that our method leads to a 90% accuracy rate of detecting duplicated images, a ~ 13% improvement in detection accuracy in comparison to other manipulation detection methods. We also show how effective the pre-processing steps are by comparing our method to other state-of-art manipulation detectors which lack these steps.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2021.

Builds on

3 of 13 references.

References · 3

  1. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
  2. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
  3. 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.