mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural OCR Post-Hoc Correction of Historical Corpora

arXiv 2102.00583 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2021cs.CLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Optical character recognition (OCR) is crucial for a deeper access to historical collections. OCR needs to account for orthographic variations, typefaces, or language evolution (i.e., new letters, word spellings), as the main source of character, word, or word segmentation transcription errors. For digital corpora of historical prints, the errors are further exacerbated due to low scan quality and lack of language standardization. For the task of OCR post-hoc correction, we propose a neural approach based on a combination of recurrent (RNN) and deep convolutional network (ConvNet) to correct OCR transcription errors. At character level we flexibly capture errors, and decode the corrected output based on a novel attention mechanism. Accounting for the input and output similarity, we propose a new loss function that rewards the model's correcting behavior. Evaluation on a historical book corpus in German language shows that our models are robust in capturing diverse OCR transcription errors and reduce the word error rate of 32.3% by more than 89%.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2021.

Builds on

17 of 37 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  4. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  5. 2016Language Modeling with Gated Convolutional Networkscited by 688
  6. 2017Convolutional Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 550
  7. 2015Character-Aware Neural Language Modelscited by 129
  8. 2016A Convolutional Encoder Model for Neural Machine Translationcited by 54
  9. 2016Character-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 33
  10. 2016A Character-Level Decoder without Explicit Segmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 21
  11. 2016Neural Language Correction with Character-Based Attentioncited by 18
  12. 2016Incorporating Structural Alignment Biases into an Attentional Neural Translation Modelcited by 16
5 more
  1. 2015Improved Transition-Based Parsing by Modeling Characters instead of Words with LSTMscited by 10
  2. 2016Still not there? Comparing Traditional Sequence-to-Sequence Models to Encoder-Decoder Neural Networks on Monotone String Translation Taskscited by 6
  3. 2017Improving OCR Accuracy on Early Printed Books by utilizing Cross Fold Training and Votingcited by 6
  4. 2018State of the Art Optical Character Recognition of 19th Century Fraktur Scripts using Open Source Enginescited by 4
  5. 2018Character-Level Models versus Morphology in Semantic Role Labelingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 7; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

12 papers.