mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hybrid leg compliance enables robots to operate with sensorimotor delays and low control update frequencies

arXiv 2101.12255 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2021cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Animals locomote robustly and agile, albeit significant sensorimotor delays of their nervous system. The sensorimotor control of legged robots is implemented with much higher frequencies-often in the kilohertz range-and sensor and actuator delays in the low millisecond range. But especially at harsh impacts with unknown touch-down timing, legged robots show unstable controller behaviors, while animals are seemingly not impacted. Here we examine this discrepancy and suggest a hybrid robotic leg and controller design. We implemented a physical, parallel joint compliance dimensioned in combination with an active, virtual leg length controller. We present an extensive set of systematic experiments both in computer simulation and hardware. Our hybrid leg and controller design shows previously unseen robustness, in the presence of sensorimotor delays up to 60 ms, or control frequencies as low as 20 Hz, for a drop landing task from 1.3 leg lengths high and with a passive compliance ratio of 0.7. In computer simulations, we report successful drop-landings of the hybrid compliant leg from 3.8 leg lengths (1.2 m) for a 2 kg quadruped robot with 100 Hz control frequency and a sensorimotor delay of 35 ms. The results of our presented hybrid leg design and control provide a further explanation for the performance robustness of animals, and the resulting discrepancy between animals and legged robots.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

3 papers.