mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Measuring Intelligence and Growth Rate: Variations on Hibbard's Intelligence Measure

arXiv 2101.12047 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2021cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In 2011, Hibbard suggested an intelligence measure for agents who compete in an adversarial sequence prediction game. We argue that Hibbard's idea should actually be considered as two separate ideas: first, that the intelligence of such agents can be measured based on the growth rates of the runtimes of the competitors that they defeat; and second, one specific (somewhat arbitrary) method for measuring said growth rates. Whereas Hibbard's intelligence measure is based on the latter growth-rate-measuring method, we survey other methods for measuring function growth rates, and exhibit the resulting Hibbard-like intelligence measures and taxonomies. Of particular interest, we obtain intelligence taxonomies based on Big-O and Big-Theta notation systems, which taxonomies are novel in that they challenge conventional notions of what an intelligence measure should look like. We discuss how intelligence measurement of sequence predictors can indirectly serve as intelligence measurement for agents with Artificial General Intelligence (AGIs).

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2021.

Builds on

3 of 37 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020The Archimedean trap: Why traditional reinforcement learning will probably not yield AGIcited by 6
  2. 2019Intelligence via ultrafilters: structural properties of some intelligence comparators of deterministic Legg-Hutter agentscited by 4
  3. 2019Measuring the intelligence of an idealized mechanical knowing agentcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1.

3 papers.