mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Note on the Representation Power of GHHs

arXiv 2101.11286 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2021cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this note we prove a sharp lower bound on the necessary number of nestings of nested absolute-value functions of generalized hinging hyperplanes (GHH) to represent arbitrary CPWL functions. Previous upper bound states that n+1 nestings is sufficient for GHH to achieve universal representation power, but the corresponding lower bound was unknown. We prove that n nestings is necessary for universal representation power, which provides an almost tight lower bound. We also show that one-hidden-layer neural networks don't have universal approximation power over the whole domain. The analysis is based on a key lemma showing that any finite sum of periodic functions is either non-integrable or the zero function, which might be of independent interest.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2021.

Builds on

1 of 10 references.

References · 1

  1. 2017The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the Widthcited by 318

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

3 papers.