Hierarchical Clustering via Sketches and Hierarchical Correlation Clustering
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, Hierarchical Clustering (HC) has been considered through the lens of optimization. In particular, two maximization objectives have been defined. Moseley and Wang defined the Revenue objective to handle similarity information given by a weighted graph on the data points (w.l.o.g., [0,1] weights), while Cohen-Addad et al. defined the Dissimilarity objective to handle dissimilarity information. In this paper, we prove structural lemmas for both objectives allowing us to convert any HC tree to a tree with constant number of internal nodes while incurring an arbitrarily small loss in each objective. Although the best-known approximations are 0.585 and 0.667 respectively, using our lemmas we obtain approximations arbitrarily close to 1, if not all weights are small (i.e., there exist constants ε, δ such that the fraction of weights smaller than δ, is at most 1 - ε); such instances encompass many metric-based similarity instances, thereby improving upon prior work. Finally, we introduce Hierarchical Correlation Clustering (HCC) to handle instances that contain similarity and dissimilarity information simultaneously. For HCC, we provide an approximation of 0.4767 and for complementary similarity/dissimilarity weights (analogous to +/- correlation clustering), we again present nearly-optimal approximations.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025The Complexity of Finding Local Optima in Contrastive Learning21 Sep 2025
- 2021Hierarchical Clustering: O(1)-Approximation for Well-Clustered Graphs16 Dec 2021
- 2021Hierarchical Clustering: New Bounds and Objective12 Nov 2021