Coloring the Black Box: What Synesthesia Tells Us about Character Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In contrast to their word- or sentence-level counterparts, character embeddings are still poorly understood. We aim at closing this gap with an in-depth study of English character embeddings. For this, we use resources from research on grapheme-color synesthesia -- a neuropsychological phenomenon where letters are associated with colors, which give us insight into which characters are similar for synesthetes and how characters are organized in color space. Comparing 10 different character embeddings, we ask: How similar are character embeddings to a synesthete's perception of characters? And how similar are character embeddings extracted from different models? We find that LSTMs agree with humans more than transformers. Comparing across tasks, grapheme-to-phoneme conversion results in the most human-like character embeddings. Finally, ELMo embeddings differ from both humans and other models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2021.
Builds on
21 of 49 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2018Deep contextualized word representationscited by 2,285
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 994
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 807
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 553
9 more
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
- 2014SimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models with (Genuine) Similarity Estimationcited by 170
- 2017What do Neural Machine Translation Models Learn about Morphology?cited by 165
- 2020Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Evaluation of Word Prediction Modelscited by 54
- 2017CoNLL-SIGMORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morphological Reinflection in 52 Languagescited by 40
- 2016Multilingual Part-of-Speech Tagging with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Models and Auxiliary Losscited by 30
- 2018Verb Argument Structure Alternations in Word and Sentence Embeddingscited by 25
- 2018From Phonology to Syntax: Unsupervised Linguistic Typology at Different Levels with Language Embeddingscited by 13
- 2016Single-Model Encoder-Decoder with Explicit Morphological Representation for Reinflectioncited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.