mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Encrypted Internet traffic classification using a supervised Spiking Neural Network

arXiv 2101.09818 ↗First posted 24 Jan 2021cs.LG cs.NIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Internet traffic recognition is an essential tool for access providers since recognizing traffic categories related to different data packets transmitted on a network help them define adapted priorities. That means, for instance, high priority requirements for an audio conference and low ones for a file transfer, to enhance user experience. As internet traffic becomes increasingly encrypted, the mainstream classic traffic recognition technique, payload inspection, is rendered ineffective. This paper uses machine learning techniques for encrypted traffic classification, looking only at packet size and time of arrival. Spiking neural networks (SNN), largely inspired by how biological neurons operate, were used for two reasons. Firstly, they are able to recognize time-related data packet features. Secondly, they can be implemented efficiently on neuromorphic hardware with a low energy footprint. Here we used a very simple feedforward SNN, with only one fully-connected hidden layer, and trained in a supervised manner using the newly introduced method known as Surrogate Gradient Learning. Surprisingly, such a simple SNN reached an accuracy of 95.9% on ISCX datasets, outperforming previous approaches. Besides better accuracy, there is also a very significant improvement on simplicity: input size, number of neurons, trainable parameters are all reduced by one to four orders of magnitude. Next, we analyzed the reasons for this good accuracy. It turns out that, beyond spatial (i.e. packet size) features, the SNN also exploits temporal ones, mostly the nearly synchronous (within a 200ms range) arrival times of packets with certain sizes. Taken together, these results show that SNNs are an excellent fit for encrypted internet traffic classification: they can be more accurate than conventional artificial neural networks (ANN), and they could be implemented efficiently on low power embedded systems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2021.

Builds on

8 of 38 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 765
  2. 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 604
  3. 2017Spatio-Temporal Backpropagation for Training High-performance Spiking Neural Networkscited by 399
  4. 2020Incorporating Learnable Membrane Time Constant to Enhance Learning of Spiking Neural Networkscited by 340
  5. 2017Deep Packet: A Novel Approach For Encrypted Traffic Classification Using Deep Learningcited by 69
  6. 2020Effective and Efficient Computation with Multiple-timescale Spiking Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 43
  7. 2020Low-activity supervised convolutional spiking neural networks applied to speech commands recognitioncited by 19
  8. 2019Technical report: supervised training of convolutional spiking neural networks with PyTorchcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.