mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adversarial Machine Learning for Flooding Attacks on 5G Radio Access Network Slicing

arXiv 2101.08724 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2021cs.NI cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Network slicing manages network resources as virtual resource blocks (RBs) for the 5G Radio Access Network (RAN). Each communication request comes with quality of experience (QoE) requirements such as throughput and latency/deadline, which can be met by assigning RBs, communication power, and processing power to the request. For a completed request, the achieved reward is measured by the weight (priority) of this request. Then, the reward is maximized over time by allocating resources, e.g., with reinforcement learning (RL). In this paper, we introduce a novel flooding attack on 5G network slicing, where an adversary generates fake network slicing requests to consume the 5G RAN resources that would be otherwise available to real requests. The adversary observes the spectrum and builds a surrogate model on the network slicing algorithm through RL that decides on how to craft fake requests to minimize the reward of real requests over time. We show that the portion of the reward achieved by real requests may be much less than the reward that would be achieved when there was no attack. We also show that this flooding attack is more effective than other benchmark attacks such as random fake requests and fake requests with the minimum resource requirement (lowest QoE requirement). Fake requests may be detected due to their fixed weight. As an attack enhancement, we present schemes to randomize weights of fake requests and show that it is still possible to reduce the reward of real requests while maintaining the balance on weight distributions.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2021.

Builds on

18 of 25 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018Adversarial Attacks on Deep-Learning Based Radio Signal Classificationcited by 47
  2. 2020Deep Learning for Wireless Communicationscited by 39
  3. 2018Deep Learning for Launching and Mitigating Wireless Jamming Attackscited by 31
  4. 2020Channel-Aware Adversarial Attacks Against Deep Learning-Based Wireless Signal Classifierscited by 28
  5. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Resource Management in Network Slicingcited by 27
  6. 2019Adversarial Deep Learning for Over-the-Air Spectrum Poisoning Attackscited by 20
  7. 2019The Best Defense Is a Good Offense: Adversarial Attacks to Avoid Modulation Detectioncited by 17
  8. 2020Over-the-Air Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Based Modulation Classifier over Wireless Channelscited by 17
  9. 2019Trojan Attacks on Wireless Signal Classification with Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 15
  10. 2020Over-the-Air Membership Inference Attacks as Privacy Threats for Deep Learning-based Wireless Signal Classifierscited by 13
  11. 2021Adversarial Machine Learning for 5G Communications Securitycited by 12
  12. 2020Adversarial Attacks with Multiple Antennas Against Deep Learning-Based Modulation Classifierscited by 9
6 more
  1. 2021How to Attack and Defend NextG Radio Access Network Slicing with Reinforcement Learningcited by 8
  2. 2020How to Make 5G Communications "Invisible": Adversarial Machine Learning for Wireless Privacycited by 7
  3. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning for Network Slicing with Heterogeneous Resource Requirements and Time Varying Traffic Dynamicscited by 6
  4. 2020Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Resource Optimization in 5G Radio Access Network Slicingcited by 6
  5. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Network Slicing in 5G for Intelligent Vehicular Systems and Smart Citiescited by 3
  6. 2019The Slice Is Served: Enforcing Radio Access Network Slicing in Virtualized 5G Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

6 papers.