mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stress Testing of Meta-learning Approaches for Few-shot Learning

arXiv 2101.08587 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Meta-learning (ML) has emerged as a promising learning method under resource constraints such as few-shot learning. ML approaches typically propose a methodology to learn generalizable models. In this work-in-progress paper, we put the recent ML approaches to a stress test to discover their limitations. Precisely, we measure the performance of ML approaches for few-shot learning against increasing task complexity. Our results show a quick degradation in the performance of initialization strategies for ML (MAML, TAML, and MetaSGD), while surprisingly, approaches that use an optimization strategy (MetaLSTM) perform significantly better. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of an optimization strategy for ML (MetaLSTM++) trained in a MAML manner over a pure optimization strategy. Our experiments also show that the optimization strategies for ML achieve higher transferability from simple to complex tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2021.

Builds on

5 of 7 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  2. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  3. 2016Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descentcited by 616
  4. 2017Meta-SGD: Learning to Learn Quickly for Few-Shot Learningcited by 377
  5. 2018Task-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Few-shot Learningcited by 151

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

2 papers.