mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Influence Estimation for Generative Adversarial Networks

arXiv 2101.08367 ↗First posted 20 Jan 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying harmful instances, whose absence in a training dataset improves model performance, is important for building better machine learning models. Although previous studies have succeeded in estimating harmful instances under supervised settings, they cannot be trivially extended to generative adversarial networks (GANs). This is because previous approaches require that (1) the absence of a training instance directly affects the loss value and that (2) the change in the loss directly measures the harmfulness of the instance for the performance of a model. In GAN training, however, neither of the requirements is satisfied. This is because, (1) the generator's loss is not directly affected by the training instances as they are not part of the generator's training steps, and (2) the values of GAN's losses normally do not capture the generative performance of a model. To this end, (1) we propose an influence estimation method that uses the Jacobian of the gradient of the generator's loss with respect to the discriminator's parameters (and vice versa) to trace how the absence of an instance in the discriminator's training affects the generator's parameters, and (2) we propose a novel evaluation scheme, in which we assess harmfulness of each training instance on the basis of how GAN evaluation metric (e.g., inception score) is expect to change due to the removal of the instance. We experimentally verified that our influence estimation method correctly inferred the changes in GAN evaluation metrics. Further, we demonstrated that the removal of the identified harmful instances effectively improved the model's generative performance with respect to various GAN evaluation metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jan 2021.

Builds on

18 of 29 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  4. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
  5. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
  6. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
  7. 2016Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 1,898
  8. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  9. 2016Least Squares Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,000
  10. 2016Learning a Probabilistic Latent Space of Object Shapes via 3D Generative-Adversarial Modelingcited by 558
  11. 2017Data Augmentation Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 278
  12. 2018Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measurescited by 224
6 more
  1. 2018A Variational Inequality Perspective on Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 144
  2. 2019Data Cleansing for Models Trained with SGDcited by 67
  3. 2018Interpreting Black Box Predictions using Fisher Kernelscited by 48
  4. 2017AdaGAN: Boosting Generative Modelscited by 34
  5. 2018An Improved Evaluation Framework for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 26
  6. 2019Noise Robust Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

11 papers.