Translating Hausdorff is Hard: Fine-Grained Lower Bounds for Hausdorff Distance Under Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computing the similarity of two point sets is a ubiquitous task in medical imaging, geometric shape comparison, trajectory analysis, and many more settings. Arguably the most basic distance measure for this task is the Hausdorff distance, which assigns to each point from one set the closest point in the other set and then evaluates the maximum distance of any assigned pair. A drawback is that this distance measure is not translational invariant, that is, comparing two objects just according to their shape while disregarding their position in space is impossible. Fortunately, there is a canonical translational invariant version, the Hausdorff distance under translation, which minimizes the Hausdorff distance over all translations of one of the point sets. For point sets of size n and m, the Hausdorff distance under translation can be computed in time tilde O(nm) for the L1 and L_∞ norm [Chew, Kedem SWAT'92] and tilde O(nm (n+m)) for the L2 norm [Huttenlocher, Kedem, Sharir DCG'93]. As these bounds have not been improved for over 25 years, in this paper we approach the Hausdorff distance under translation from the perspective of fine-grained complexity theory. We show (i) a matching lower bound of (nm)1-o(1) for L1 and L_∞ (and all other Lp norms) assuming the Orthogonal Vectors Hypothesis and (ii) a matching lower bound of n2-o(1) for L2 in the imbalanced case of m = O(1) assuming the 3SUM Hypothesis.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022On The Computational Complexity of Self-Attentioncited by 139
- 2022On The Computational Complexity of Self-Attention11 Sep 2022