A framework to compare music generative models using automatic evaluation metrics extended to rhythm
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To train a machine learning model is necessary to take numerous decisions about many options for each process involved, in the field of sequence generation and more specifically of music composition, the nature of the problem helps to narrow the options but at the same time, some other options appear for specific challenges. This paper takes the framework proposed in a previous research that did not consider rhythm to make a series of design decisions, then, rhythm support is added to evaluate the performance of two RNN memory cells in the creation of monophonic music. The model considers the handling of music transposition and the framework evaluates the quality of the generated pieces using automatic quantitative metrics based on geometry which have rhythm support added as well.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2021.
Builds on
6 of 16 references.
References · 6
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,341
- 2017Optical Music Recognition with Convolutional Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 12
- 2020Sequence Generation using Deep Recurrent Networks and Embeddings: A study case in musiccited by 3
- 2020Embeddings as representation for symbolic musiccited by 2
- 2020Cross entropy as objective function for music generative modelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Survey on the Evaluation of Generative Models in Musiccited by 10
- 2025Survey on the Evaluation of Generative Models in Music5 Jun 2025