mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mitigating the Position Bias of Transformer Models in Passage Re-Ranking

arXiv 2101.06980 ↗First posted 18 Jan 2021cs.IR cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised machine learning models and their evaluation strongly depends on the quality of the underlying dataset. When we search for a relevant piece of information it may appear anywhere in a given passage. However, we observe a bias in the position of the correct answer in the text in two popular Question Answering datasets used for passage re-ranking. The excessive favoring of earlier positions inside passages is an unwanted artefact. This leads to three common Transformer-based re-ranking models to ignore relevant parts in unseen passages. More concerningly, as the evaluation set is taken from the same biased distribution, the models overfitting to that bias overestimate their true effectiveness. In this work we analyze position bias on datasets, the contextualized representations, and their effect on retrieval results. We propose a debiasing method for retrieval datasets. Our results show that a model trained on a position-biased dataset exhibits a significant decrease in re-ranking effectiveness when evaluated on a debiased dataset. We demonstrate that by mitigating the position bias, Transformer-based re-ranking models are equally effective on a biased and debiased dataset, as well as more effective in a transfer-learning setting between two differently biased datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2021.

Builds on

41 of 56 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  4. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  6. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  7. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  8. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  9. 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
  10. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,112
  11. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  12. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
29 more
  1. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  2. 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 629
  3. 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 568
  4. 2018AllenNLP: A Deep Semantic Natural Language Processing Platformcited by 347
  5. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 337
  6. 2018Hypothesis Only Baselines in Natural Language Inferencecited by 291
  7. 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 279
  8. 2020Sparse, Dense, and Attentional Representations for Text Retrievalcited by 213
  9. 2018Adversarial Removal of Demographic Attributes from Text Datacited by 166
  10. 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
  11. 2018Overcoming Language Priors in Visual Question Answering with Adversarial Regularizationcited by 104
  12. 2019Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoningcited by 87
  13. 2017End-to-End Neural Ad-hoc Ranking with Kernel Poolingcited by 85
  14. 2019CEDR: Contextualized Embeddings for Document Rankingcited by 77
  15. 2018Towards Robust and Privacy-preserving Text Representationscited by 75
  16. 2016A Thorough Examination of the CNN/Daily Mail Reading Comprehension Taskcited by 71
  17. 2018Performance Impact Caused by Hidden Bias of Training Data for Recognizing Textual Entailmentcited by 58
  18. 2019Don't Take the Premise for Granted: Mitigating Artifacts in Natural Language Inferencecited by 48
  19. 2020PARADE: Passage Representation Aggregation for Document Rerankingcited by 44
  20. 2020Do Neural Ranking Models Intensify Gender Bias?cited by 28
  21. 2019Adversarial Regularization for Visual Question Answering: Strengths, Shortcomings, and Side Effectscited by 25
  22. 2019Self-Attention with Structural Position Representationscited by 21
  23. 2020Interpretable & Time-Budget-Constrained Contextualization for Re-Rankingcited by 21
  24. 2020A White Box Analysis of ColBERTcited by 14
  25. 2018Blindfold Baselines for Embodied QAcited by 13
  26. 2019Let's measure run time! Extending the IR replicability infrastructure to include performance aspectscited by 10
  27. 2020Bias in Conversational Search: The Double-Edged Sword of the Personalized Knowledge Graphcited by 10
  28. 2019Assessing the Ability of Self-Attention Networks to Learn Word Ordercited by 9
  29. 2020Fine-Grained Relevance Annotations for Multi-Task Document Ranking and Question Answeringcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

10 papers.