Learning DNN networks using un-rectifying ReLU with compressed sensing application
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The un-rectifying technique expresses a non-linear point-wise activation function as a data-dependent variable, which means that the activation variable along with its input and output can all be employed in optimization. The ReLU network in this study was un-rectified means that the activation functions could be replaced with data-dependent activation variables in the form of equations and constraints. The discrete nature of activation variables associated with un-rectifying ReLUs allows the reformulation of deep learning problems as problems of combinatorial optimization. However, we demonstrate that the optimal solution to a combinatorial optimization problem can be preserved by relaxing the discrete domains of activation variables to closed intervals. This makes it easier to learn a network using methods developed for real-domain constrained optimization. We also demonstrate that by introducing data-dependent slack variables as constraints, it is possible to optimize a network based on the augmented Lagrangian approach. This means that our method could theoretically achieve global convergence and all limit points are critical points of the learning problem. In experiments, our novel approach to solving the compressed sensing recovery problem achieved state-of-the-art performance when applied to the MNIST database and natural images.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2021.
Builds on
26 of 49 references.
References · 26
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
- 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,033
- 2016Understanding Deep Neural Networks with Rectified Linear Unitscited by 257
- 2014Compressing Deep Convolutional Networks using Vector Quantizationcited by 195
- 2017Bounding and Counting Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 161
- 2015Global Convergence of ADMM in Nonconvex Nonsmooth Optimizationcited by 98
14 more
- 2016Training Neural Networks Without Gradients: A Scalable ADMM Approachcited by 61
- 2018Mad Max: Affine Spline Insights into Deep Learningcited by 55
- 2019The Geometry of Deep Networks: Power Diagram Subdivisioncited by 53
- 2018Global Convergence of Block Coordinate Descent in Deep Learningcited by 38
- 2014A globally convergent algorithm for nonconvex optimization based on block coordinate updatecited by 29
- 2017Convergent Block Coordinate Descent for Training Tikhonov Regularized Deep Neural Networkscited by 26
- 2018Beyond Backprop: Online Alternating Minimization with Auxiliary Variablescited by 23
- 2017Learning to Invert: Signal Recovery via Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 22
- 2017On Data-Driven Saak Transformcited by 22
- 2018Fenchel Lifted Networks: A Lagrange Relaxation of Neural Network Trainingcited by 19
- 2018A Proximal Block Coordinate Descent Algorithm for Deep Neural Network Trainingcited by 15
- 2019On ADMM in Deep Learning: Convergence and Saturation-Avoidancecited by 15
- 2014On the Convergence of Alternating Direction Lagrangian Methods for Nonconvex Structured Optimization Problemscited by 8
- 2018ADMM for Multiaffine Constrained Optimizationcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.