Cooperative and Competitive Biases for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training a multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithm is more challenging than training a single-agent reinforcement learning algorithm, because the result of a multi-agent task strongly depends on the complex interactions among agents and their interactions with a stochastic and dynamic environment. We propose an algorithm that boosts MARL training using the biased action information of other agents based on a friend-or-foe concept. For a cooperative and competitive environment, there are generally two groups of agents: cooperative-agents and competitive-agents. In the proposed algorithm, each agent updates its value function using its own action and the biased action information of other agents in the two groups. The biased joint action of cooperative agents is computed as the sum of their actual joint action and the imaginary cooperative joint action, by assuming all the cooperative agents jointly maximize the target agent's value function. The biased joint action of competitive agents can be computed similarly. Each agent then updates its own value function using the biased action information, resulting in a biased value function and corresponding biased policy. Subsequently, the biased policy of each agent is inevitably subjected to recommend an action to cooperate and compete with other agents, thereby introducing more active interactions among agents and enhancing the MARL policy learning. We empirically demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms existing algorithms in various mixed cooperative-competitive environments. Furthermore, the introduced biases gradually decrease as the training proceeds and the correction based on the imaginary assumption vanishes.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jan 2021.
Builds on
8 of 20 references.
References · 8
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,558
- 2017Hindsight Experience Replaycited by 1,136
- 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 261
- 2019Influence-Based Multi-Agent Explorationcited by 75
- 2019Multi-Agent Actor-Critic with Hierarchical Graph Attention Networkcited by 33
- 2019Coordinated Exploration via Intrinsic Rewards for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
- 2019Exploration with Unreliable Intrinsic Reward in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systemscited by 126
- 2026The Five Ws of Multi-Agent Communication: Who Talks to Whom, When, What, and Why -- A Survey from MARL to Emergent Language and LLMscited by 10
- 2022The Importance of Credo in Multiagent Learningcited by 7
- 2022Exploring the Benefits of Teams in Multiagent Learningcited by 5
- 2025Concurrent Learning with Aggregated States via Randomized Least Squares Value Iterationcited by 0
- 2026The Five Ws of Multi-Agent Communication: Who Talks to Whom, When, What, and Why -- A Survey from MARL to Emergent Language and LLMs12 Feb 2026
- 2025Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems31 Mar 2025
- 2025Concurrent Learning with Aggregated States via Randomized Least Squares Value Iteration23 Jan 2025
- 2022Exploring the Benefits of Teams in Multiagent Learning4 May 2022
- 2022The Importance of Credo in Multiagent Learning15 Apr 2022