mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Mispronunciation Detection in Non-native (L2) English with Uncertainty Modeling

arXiv 2101.06396 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2021eess.AS cs.LG cs.SDcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A common approach to the automatic detection of mispronunciation in language learning is to recognize the phonemes produced by a student and compare it to the expected pronunciation of a native speaker. This approach makes two simplifying assumptions: a) phonemes can be recognized from speech with high accuracy, b) there is a single correct way for a sentence to be pronounced. These assumptions do not always hold, which can result in a significant amount of false mispronunciation alarms. We propose a novel approach to overcome this problem based on two principles: a) taking into account uncertainty in the automatic phoneme recognition step, b) accounting for the fact that there may be multiple valid pronunciations. We evaluate the model on non-native (L2) English speech of German, Italian and Polish speakers, where it is shown to increase the precision of detecting mispronunciations by up to 18% (relative) compared to the common approach.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2021.

Builds on

6 of 21 references.

References · 6

  1. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  2. 2013Speech Recognition with Deep Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 666
  3. 2019LibriTTS: A Corpus Derived from LibriSpeech for Text-to-Speechcited by 639
  4. 2015Attention-Based Models for Speech Recognitioncited by 400
  5. 2015MXNet: A Flexible and Efficient Machine Learning Library for Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 195
  6. 2020ASR-Free Pronunciation Assessmentcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

5 papers.