mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparisons of Graph Neural Networks on Cancer Classification Leveraging a Joint of Phenotypic and Genetic Features

arXiv 2101.05866 ↗First posted 14 Jan 2021cs.LG q-bio.QMcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cancer is responsible for millions of deaths worldwide every year. Although significant progress hasbeen achieved in cancer medicine, many issues remain to be addressed for improving cancer therapy.Appropriate cancer patient stratification is the prerequisite for selecting appropriate treatment plan, ascancer patients are of known heterogeneous genetic make-ups and phenotypic differences. In thisstudy, built upon deep phenotypic characterizations extractable from Mayo Clinic electronic healthrecords (EHRs) and genetic test reports for a collection of cancer patients, we evaluated variousgraph neural networks (GNNs) leveraging a joint of phenotypic and genetic features for cancer typeclassification. Models were applied and fine-tuned on the Mayo Clinic cancer disease dataset. Theassessment was done through the reported accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 values as well as throughF1 scores based on the disease class. Per our evaluation results, GNNs on average outperformed thebaseline models with mean statistics always being higher that those of the baseline models (0.849 vs0.772 for accuracy, 0.858 vs 0.794 for precision, 0.843 vs 0.759 for recall, and 0.843 vs 0.855 for F1score). Among GNNs, ChebNet, GraphSAGE, and TAGCN showed the best performance, while GATshowed the worst. We applied and compared eight GNN models including AGNN, ChebNet, GAT,GCN, GIN, GraphSAGE, SGC, and TAGCN on the Mayo Clinic cancer disease dataset and assessedtheir performance as well as compared them with each other and with more conventional machinelearning models such as decision tree, gradient boosting, multi-layer perceptron, naive bayes, andrandom forest which we used as the baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2021.

Builds on

11 of 38 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  4. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  5. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  6. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
  7. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
  8. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
  9. 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,470
  10. 2017Topology Adaptive Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 112
  11. 2020Zero-Shot Video Object Segmentation via Attentive Graph Neural Networkscited by 84

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.