mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Scaling the Convex Barrier with Sparse Dual Algorithms

arXiv 2101.05844 ↗First posted 14 Jan 2021cs.LGcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tight and efficient neural network bounding is crucial to the scaling of neural network verification systems. Many efficient bounding algorithms have been presented recently, but they are often too loose to verify more challenging properties. This is due to the weakness of the employed relaxation, which is usually a linear program of size linear in the number of neurons. While a tighter linear relaxation for piecewise-linear activations exists, it comes at the cost of exponentially many constraints and currently lacks an efficient customized solver. We alleviate this deficiency by presenting two novel dual algorithms: one operates a subgradient method on a small active set of dual variables, the other exploits the sparsity of Frank-Wolfe type optimizers to incur only a linear memory cost. Both methods recover the strengths of the new relaxation: tightness and a linear separation oracle. At the same time, they share the benefits of previous dual approaches for weaker relaxations: massive parallelism, GPU implementation, low cost per iteration and valid bounds at any time. As a consequence, we can obtain better bounds than off-the-shelf solvers in only a fraction of their running time, attaining significant formal verification speed-ups.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jan 2021.

Builds on

21 of 45 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  5. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  6. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  7. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  8. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 328
  9. 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 255
  10. 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 242
  11. 2018Semidefinite relaxations for certifying robustness to adversarial examplescited by 179
  12. 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
9 more
  1. 2019Branch and Bound for Piecewise Linear Neural Network Verificationcited by 138
  2. 2018A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networkscited by 125
  3. 2019A Convex Relaxation Barrier to Tight Robustness Verification of Neural Networkscited by 125
  4. 2018Strong mixed-integer programming formulations for trained neural networkscited by 115
  5. 2018A Statistical Approach to Assessing Neural Network Robustnesscited by 54
  6. 2020The Convex Relaxation Barrier, Revisited: Tightened Single-Neuron Relaxations for Neural Network Verificationcited by 50
  7. 2019Neural Network Branching for Neural Network Verificationcited by 45
  8. 2020Lagrangian Decomposition for Neural Network Verificationcited by 35
  9. 2016Frank-Wolfe Algorithms for Saddle Point Problemscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

10 papers.