mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ORDNet: Capturing Omni-Range Dependencies for Scene Parsing

arXiv 2101.03929 ↗First posted 11 Jan 2021cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning to capture dependencies between spatial positions is essential to many visual tasks, especially the dense labeling problems like scene parsing. Existing methods can effectively capture long-range dependencies with self-attention mechanism while short ones by local convolution. However, there is still much gap between long-range and short-range dependencies, which largely reduces the models' flexibility in application to diverse spatial scales and relationships in complicated natural scene images. To fill such a gap, we develop a Middle-Range (MR) branch to capture middle-range dependencies by restricting self-attention into local patches. Also, we observe that the spatial regions which have large correlations with others can be emphasized to exploit long-range dependencies more accurately, and thus propose a Reweighed Long-Range (RLR) branch. Based on the proposed MR and RLR branches, we build an Omni-Range Dependencies Network (ORDNet) which can effectively capture short-, middle- and long-range dependencies. Our ORDNet is able to extract more comprehensive context information and well adapt to complex spatial variance in scene images. Extensive experiments show that our proposed ORDNet outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods on three scene parsing benchmarks including PASCAL Context, COCO Stuff and ADE20K, demonstrating the superiority of capturing omni-range dependencies in deep models for scene parsing task.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2021.

Builds on

46 of 66 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  6. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
  7. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  8. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  9. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
  10. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,479
  11. 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,477
  12. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,293
34 more
  1. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
  2. 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,487
  3. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,423
  4. 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,133
  5. 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,026
  6. 2018Dual Attention Network for Scene Segmentationcited by 1,003
  7. 2016COCO-Stuff: Thing and Stuff Classes in Contextcited by 864
  8. 2018Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 809
  9. 2018CCNet: Criss-Cross Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 718
  10. 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 554
  11. 2016RefineNet: Multi-Path Refinement Networks for High-Resolution Semantic Segmentationcited by 465
  12. 2019Selective Kernel Networkscited by 403
  13. 2015Visual7W: Grounded Question Answering in Imagescited by 318
  14. 2018Context Encoding for Semantic Segmentationcited by 290
  15. 2016Hierarchical Question-Image Co-Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 278
  16. 2015Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answeringcited by 273
  17. 2015BoxSup: Exploiting Bounding Boxes to Supervise Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 238
  18. 2015Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 214
  19. 2016Wider or Deeper: Revisiting the ResNet Model for Visual Recognitioncited by 184
  20. 2015ParseNet: Looking Wider to See Bettercited by 177
  21. 2018BAM: Bottleneck Attention Modulecited by 172
  22. 2015Attention to Scale: Scale-aware Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 169
  23. 2015Efficient piecewise training of deep structured models for semantic segmentationcited by 71
  24. 2019Semantic Correlation Promoted Shape-Variant Context for Segmentationcited by 61
  25. 2019Interlaced Sparse Self-Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 53
  26. 2018Dynamic-structured Semantic Propagation Networkcited by 38
  27. 2019Decoders Matter for Semantic Segmentation: Data-Dependent Decoding Enables Flexible Feature Aggregationcited by 34
  28. 2018Non-locally Enhanced Encoder-Decoder Network for Single Image De-rainingcited by 33
  29. 2015Higher Order Conditional Random Fields in Deep Neural Networkscited by 26
  30. 2016Bridging Category-level and Instance-level Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 21
  31. 2016PixelNet: Towards a General Pixel-level Architecturecited by 9
  32. 2017Scene Parsing with Global Context Embeddingcited by 7
  33. 2015Top-Down Learning for Structured Labeling with Convolutional Pseudopriorcited by 3
  34. 2017LabelBank: Revisiting Global Perspectives for Semantic Segmentationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.