Deep Neural Networks to Recover Unknown Physical Parameters from Oscillating Time Series
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely used in pattern-recognition tasks for which a human comprehensible, quantitative description of the data-generating process, e.g., in the form of equations, cannot be achieved. While doing so, DNNs often produce an abstract (entangled and non-interpretable) representation of the data-generating process. This is one of the reasons why DNNs are not extensively used in physics-signal processing: physicists generally require their analyses to yield quantitative information about the studied systems. In this article we use DNNs to disentangle components of oscillating time series, and recover meaningful information. We show that, because DNNs can find useful abstract feature representations, they can be used when prior knowledge about the signal-generating process exists, but is not complete, as it is particularly the case in "new-physics" searches. To this aim, we train our DNN on synthetic oscillating time series to perform two tasks: a regression of the signal latent parameters and signal denoising by an Autoencoder-like architecture. We show that the regression and denoising performance is similar to those of least-square curve fittings (LS-fit) with true latent parameters' initial guesses, in spite of the DNN needing no initial guesses at all. We then explore applications in which we believe our architecture could prove useful for time-series processing in physics, when prior knowledge is incomplete. As an example, we employ DNNs as a tool to inform LS-fits when initial guesses are unknown. We show that the regression can be performed on some latent parameters, while ignoring the existence of others. Because the Autoencoder needs no prior information about the physical model, the remaining unknown latent parameters can still be captured, thus making use of partial prior knowledge, while leaving space for data exploration and discoveries.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jan 2021.
Builds on
7 of 30 references.
References · 7
- 2018Training Deep Networks with Synthetic Data: Bridging the Reality Gap by Domain Randomizationcited by 294
- 2017Physics-guided Neural Networks (PGNN): An Application in Lake Temperature Modelingcited by 131
- 2018Which Neural Net Architectures Give Rise To Exploding and Vanishing Gradients?cited by 94
- 2016Medical image denoising using convolutional denoising autoencoderscited by 76
- 2018Auto-Encoding Total Correlation Explanationcited by 17
- 2014Building DNN Acoustic Models for Large Vocabulary Speech Recognitioncited by 6
- 2017Unsupervised Learning via Total Correlation Explanationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2023Automated Scientific Discovery: From Equation Discovery to Autonomous Discovery Systemscited by 19
- 2021Forecasting the outcome of spintronic experiments with Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 13
- 2024Creativity in AI: Progresses and Challengescited by 7
- 2024Aligning AI-driven discovery with human intuitioncited by 1
- 2024Creativity in AI: Progresses and Challenges22 Oct 2024
- 2024Aligning AI-driven discovery with human intuition9 Oct 2024
- 2023Automated Scientific Discovery: From Equation Discovery to Autonomous Discovery Systems3 May 2023
- 2021Forecasting the outcome of spintronic experiments with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations23 Jul 2021