Solving phase retrieval with random initial guess is nearly as good as by spectral initialization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The problem of recovering a signal x∈ ℝn from a set of magnitude measurements yi=|langle ai, x rangle |, ; i=1,ldots,m is referred as phase retrieval, which has many applications in fields of physical sciences and engineering. In this paper we show that the smoothed amplitude flow model for phase retrieval has benign geometric structure under the optimal sampling complexity. In particular, we show that when the measurements ai∈ ℝn are Gaussian random vectors and the number of measurements m≥ Cn, our smoothed amplitude flow model has no spurious local minimizers with high probability, ie., the target solution x is the unique global minimizer (up to a global phase) and the loss function has a negative directional curvature around each saddle point. Due to this benign geometric landscape, the phase retrieval problem can be solved by the gradient descent algorithms without spectral initialization. Numerical experiments show that the gradient descent algorithm with random initialization performs well even comparing with state-of-the-art algorithms with spectral initialization in empirical success rate and convergence speed.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Jan 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Stochasticity helps to navigate rough landscapes: comparing gradient-descent-based algorithms in the phase retrieval problemcited by 23
- 2024Bayes-optimal learning of an extensive-width neural network from quadratically many samplescited by 23
- 2022Misspecified Phase Retrieval with Generative Priorscited by 7
- 2024The Role of the Time-Dependent Hessian in High-Dimensional Optimizationcited by 7
- 2025Overparametrization bends the landscape: BBP transitions at initialization in simple Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2023The Local Landscape of Phase Retrieval Under Limited Samplescited by 1
- 2024Smoothed Robust Phase Retrievalcited by 0
- 2024Global convergence of gradient descent for phase retrievalcited by 0
- 2026Topological Exploration of High-Dimensional Empirical Risk Landscapes: general approach, and applications to phase retrievalcited by 0
- 2026Topological Exploration of High-Dimensional Empirical Risk Landscapes: general approach, and applications to phase retrieval19 Feb 2026
- 2025Overparametrization bends the landscape: BBP transitions at initialization in simple Neural Networks21 Oct 2025
- 2024Global convergence of gradient descent for phase retrieval13 Oct 2024
- 2024Smoothed Robust Phase Retrieval3 Sep 2024
- 2024Bayes-optimal learning of an extensive-width neural network from quadratically many samples7 Aug 2024
- 2024The Role of the Time-Dependent Hessian in High-Dimensional Optimization4 Mar 2024
- 2023The Local Landscape of Phase Retrieval Under Limited Samples26 Nov 2023
- 2022Misspecified Phase Retrieval with Generative Priors11 Oct 2022
- 2021Stochasticity helps to navigate rough landscapes: comparing gradient-descent-based algorithms in the phase retrieval problem8 Mar 2021