Fast calculation of Gaussian Process multiple-fold cross-validation residuals and their covariances
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We generalize fast Gaussian process leave-one-out formulae to multiple-fold cross-validation, highlighting in turn the covariance structure of cross-validation residuals in both Simple and Universal Kriging frameworks. We illustrate how resulting covariances affect model diagnostics. We further establish in the case of noiseless observations that correcting for covariances between residuals in cross-validation-based estimation of the scale parameter leads back to MLE. Also, we highlight in broader settings how differences between pseudo-likelihood and likelihood methods boil down to accounting or not for residual covariances. The proposed fast calculation of cross-validation residuals is implemented and benchmarked against a naive implementation. Numerical experiments highlight the accuracy and substantial speed-ups that our approach enables. However, as supported by a discussion on main drivers of computational costs and by a numerical benchmark, speed-ups steeply decline as the number of folds (say, all sharing the same size) decreases. An application to a contaminant localization test case illustrates that grouping clustered observations in folds may help improving model assessment and parameter fitting compared to Leave-One-Out. Overall, our results enable fast multiple-fold cross-validation, have direct consequences in model diagnostics, and pave the way to future work on hyperparameter fitting and on the promising field of goal-oriented fold design.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2021.
Builds on
6 of 35 references.
References · 6
- 2020Learning dynamical systems from data: a simple cross-validation perspectivecited by 23
- 2019Cross-Validation for Correlated Datacited by 11
- 2020Towards new cross-validation-based estimators for Gaussian process regression: efficient adjoint computation of gradientscited by 5
- 2016Model Selection for Gaussian Process Regression by Approximation Set Codingcited by 1
- 2018Assessing Prediction Error at Interpolation and Extrapolation Pointscited by 1
- 2020Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation for Bayesian Model Comparison in Large Datacited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2022Gaussian Process Surrogate Models for Neural Networkscited by 5
- 2025Distributional encoding for Gaussian process regression with qualitative inputscited by 1
- 2025Weighted Leave-One-Out Cross Validationcited by 0
- 2025On the Usage of Gaussian Process for Efficient Data Valuationcited by 0
- 2026What Can a Gaussian Process Design Testcited by 0
- 2026What Can a Gaussian Process Design Test7 Oct 2026
- 2025Distributional encoding for Gaussian process regression with qualitative inputs5 Jun 2025
- 2025On the Usage of Gaussian Process for Efficient Data Valuation4 Jun 2025
- 2025Weighted Leave-One-Out Cross Validation26 May 2025
- 2022Gaussian Process Surrogate Models for Neural Networks11 Aug 2022