The Nonconvex Geometry of Linear Inverse Problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The gauge function, closely related to the atomic norm, measures the complexity of a statistical model, and has found broad applications in machine learning and statistical signal processing. In a high-dimensional learning problem, the gauge function attempts to safeguard against overfitting by promoting a sparse (concise) representation within the learning alphabet. In this work, within the context of linear inverse problems, we pinpoint the source of its success, but also argue that the applicability of the gauge function is inherently limited by its convexity, and showcase several learning problems where the classical gauge function theory fails. We then introduce a new notion of statistical complexity, gaugep function, which overcomes the limitations of the gauge function. The gaugep function is a simple generalization of the gauge function that can tightly control the sparsity of a statistical model within the learning alphabet and, perhaps surprisingly, draws further inspiration from the Burer-Monteiro factorization in computational mathematics. We also propose a new learning machine, with the building block of gaugep function, and arm this machine with a number of statistical guarantees. The potential of the proposed gaugep function theory is then studied for two stylized applications. Finally, we discuss the computational aspects and, in particular, suggest a tractable numerical algorithm for implementing the new learning machine.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jan 2021.
Builds on
17 of 96 references.
References · 17
- 2017Compressed Sensing using Generative Modelscited by 337
- 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
- 2018Nonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overviewcited by 159
- 2017Spurious Local Minima are Common in Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networkscited by 104
- 2015Best Subset Selection via a Modern Optimization Lenscited by 99
- 2017Sparse High-Dimensional Regression: Exact Scalable Algorithms and Phase Transitionscited by 43
- 2013Exact Support Recovery for Sparse Spikes Deconvolutioncited by 22
- 2015Global Optimality in Tensor Factorization, Deep Learning, and Beyondcited by 22
- 2019Fast and Provable ADMM for Learning with Generative Priorscited by 18
- 2018Deterministic guarantees for Burer-Monteiro factorizations of smooth semidefinite programscited by 17
- 2015Superresolution without Separationcited by 5
- 2014Tight convex relaxations for sparse matrix factorizationcited by 3
5 more
- 2017An Approximate Shapley-Folkman Theoremcited by 2
- 2013Convexity of the image of a quadratic map via the relative entropy distancecited by 1
- 2014A Decomposition Method for Large Scale MILPs, with Performance Guarantees and a Power System Applicationcited by 1
- 2016Refined Shapley-Folkman Lemma and Its Application in Duality Gap Estimationcited by 1
- 2018Sparse non-negative super-resolution -- simplified and stabilisedcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.