A Lower Bound on DNNF Encodings of Pseudo-Boolean Constraints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Two major considerations when encoding pseudo-Boolean (PB) constraints into SAT are the size of the encoding and its propagation strength, that is, the guarantee that it has a good behaviour under unit propagation. Several encodings with propagation strength guarantees rely upon prior compilation of the constraints into DNNF (decomposable negation normal form), BDD (binary decision diagram), or some other sub-variants. However it has been shown that there exist PB-constraints whose ordered BDD (OBDD) representations, and thus the inferred CNF encodings, all have exponential size. Since DNNFs are more succinct than OBDDs, preferring encodings via DNNF to avoid size explosion seems a legitimate choice. Yet in this paper, we prove the existence of PB-constraints whose DNNFs all require exponential size.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jan 2021.
Builds on
2 of 22 references.
References · 2
- 2014A New Look at BDDs for Pseudo-Boolean Constraintscited by 8
- 2019Propagation complete encodings of smooth DNNF theoriescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.