mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A unifying approach on bias and variance analysis for classification

arXiv 2101.01765 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard bias and variance (B&V) terminologies were originally defined for the regression setting and their extensions to classification have led to several different models / definitions in the literature. In this paper, we aim to provide the link between the commonly used frameworks of Tumer & Ghosh (T&G) and James. By unifying the two approaches, we relate the B&V defined for the 0/1 loss to the standard B&V of the boundary distributions given for the squared error loss. The closed form relationships provide a deeper understanding of classification performance, and their use is demonstrated in two case studies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2021.

Builds on

5 of 28 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  2. 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
  3. 2017Aggregation of Classifiers: A Justifiable Information Granularity Approachcited by 4
  4. 2014Ensembles of Random Sphere Cover Classifierscited by 1
  5. 2017Efficient Estimation of Generalization Error and Bias-Variance Components of Ensemblescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.