mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Approximation Relationship between Optimizing Ratio of Submodular (RS) and Difference of Submodular (DS) Functions

arXiv 2101.01631 ↗First posted 5 Jan 2021cs.DS cs.LG stat.MLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We demonstrate that from an algorithm guaranteeing an approximation factor for the ratio of submodular (RS) optimization problem, we can build another algorithm having a different kind of approximation guarantee -- weaker than the classical one -- for the difference of submodular (DS) optimization problem, and vice versa. We also illustrate the link between these two problems by analyzing a textscGreedy algorithm which approximately maximizes objective functions of the form Psi(f,g), where f,g are two non-negative, monotone, submodular functions and Psi is a quasiconvex 2-variables function, which is non decreasing with respect to the first variable. For the choice Psi(f,g)triangleq f/g, we recover RS, and for the choice Psi(f,g)triangleq f-g, we recover DS. To the best of our knowledge, this greedy approach is new for DS optimization. For RS optimization, it reduces to the standard textscGreedRatio algorithm that has already been analyzed previously. However, our analysis is novel for this case.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jan 2021.

Builds on

3 of 39 references.

References · 3

  1. 2013Optimal approximation for submodular and supermodular optimization with bounded curvaturecited by 29
  2. 2019Submodular Maximization Beyond Non-negativity: Guarantees, Fast Algorithms, and Applicationscited by 20
  3. 2018Guess Free Maximization of Submodular and Linear Sumscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.