mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Efficient Transformer Decoder with Compressed Sub-layers

arXiv 2101.00542 ↗First posted 3 Jan 2021cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The large attention-based encoder-decoder network (Transformer) has become prevailing recently due to its effectiveness. But the high computation complexity of its decoder raises the inefficiency issue. By examining the mathematic formulation of the decoder, we show that under some mild conditions, the architecture could be simplified by compressing its sub-layers, the basic building block of Transformer, and achieves a higher parallelism. We thereby propose Compressed Attention Network, whose decoder layer consists of only one sub-layer instead of three. Extensive experiments on 14 WMT machine translation tasks show that our model is 1.42x faster with performance on par with a strong baseline. This strong baseline is already 2x faster than the widely used standard baseline without loss in performance.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jan 2021.

Builds on

27 of 35 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  5. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  6. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  7. 2020Reformer: The Efficient Transformercited by 1,658
  8. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  9. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,135
  10. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 973
  11. 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 906
  12. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
15 more
  1. 2018Universal Transformerscited by 613
  2. 2017Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 457
  3. 2019Reducing Transformer Depth on Demand with Structured Dropoutcited by 434
  4. 2019Learning Deep Transformer Models for Machine Translationcited by 309
  5. 2019Massively Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 246
  6. 2018Adaptive Input Representations for Neural Language Modelingcited by 226
  7. 2018The Best of Both Worlds: Combining Recent Advances in Neural Machine Translationcited by 101
  8. 2019Improving Deep Transformer with Depth-Scaled Initialization and Merged Attentioncited by 59
  9. 2018Training Deeper Neural Machine Translation Models with Transparent Attentioncited by 37
  10. 2020Shallow-to-Deep Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 36
  11. 2020Towards Fully 8-bit Integer Inference for the Transformer Modelcited by 35
  12. 2019Sharing Attention Weights for Fast Transformercited by 34
  13. 2018Accelerating Neural Transformer via an Average Attention Networkcited by 22
  14. 2018Findings of the Second Workshop on Neural Machine Translation and Generationcited by 5
  15. 2020Neural Machine Translation with Joint Representationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 2; 2023: 2.

10 papers.