Graph topology invariant gradient and sampling complexity for decentralized and stochastic optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One fundamental problem in decentralized multi-agent optimization is the trade-off between gradient/sampling complexity and communication complexity. We propose new algorithms whose gradient and sampling complexities are graph topology invariant while their communication complexities remain optimal. For convex smooth deterministic problems, we propose a primal dual sliding (PDS) algorithm that computes an ε-solution with O((tildeL/ε)1/2) gradient and O((tildeL/ε)1/2+|A|/ε) communication complexities, where tildeL is the smoothness parameter of the objective and A is related to either the graph Laplacian or the transpose of the oriented incidence matrix of the communication network. The results can be improved to O((tildeL/μ)1/2log(1/ε)) and O((tildeL/μ)1/2log(1/ε) + |A|/ε1/2) respectively with μ-strong convexity. We also propose a stochastic variant, the primal dual sliding (SPDS) algorithm for problems with stochastic gradients. The SPDS algorithm utilizes the mini-batch technique and enables the agents to perform sampling and communication simultaneously. It computes a stochastic ε-solution with O((tildeL/ε)1/2 + (σ/ε)2) sampling complexity, which can be improved to O((tildeL/μ)1/2log(1/ε) + σ2/ε) with strong convexity. Here σ2 is the variance. The communication complexities of SPDS remain the same as that of the deterministic case. All the aforementioned gradient and sampling complexities match the lower complexity bounds for centralized convex smooth optimization and are independent of the network structure. To the best of our knowledge, these gradient and sampling complexities have not been obtained before for decentralized optimization over a constraint feasible set.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Jan 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
5 papers.
- 2022Beyond spectral gap: The role of the topology in decentralized learningcited by 27
- 2023On Partial Optimal Transport: Revising the Infeasibility of Sinkhorn and Efficient Gradient Methodscited by 7
- 2022Optimal Methods for Convex Risk Averse Distributed Optimizationcited by 2
- 2024Stochastic Constrained Decentralized Optimization for Machine Learning with Fewer Data Oracles: a Gradient Sliding Approachcited by 2
- 2024Auto-conditioned primal-dual hybrid gradient method and alternating direction method of multiplierscited by 2
- 2024Auto-conditioned primal-dual hybrid gradient method and alternating direction method of multipliers2 Oct 2024
- 2024Stochastic Constrained Decentralized Optimization for Machine Learning with Fewer Data Oracles: a Gradient Sliding Approach3 Apr 2024
- 2023On Partial Optimal Transport: Revising the Infeasibility of Sinkhorn and Efficient Gradient Methods21 Dec 2023
- 2022Beyond spectral gap: The role of the topology in decentralized learning7 Jun 2022
- 2022Optimal Methods for Convex Risk Averse Distributed Optimization10 Mar 2022