A general perspective on the Metropolis-Hastings kernel
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Since its inception the Metropolis-Hastings kernel has been applied in sophisticated ways to address ever more challenging and diverse sampling problems. Its success stems from the flexibility brought by the fact that its verification and sampling implementation rests on a local ``detailed balance'' condition, as opposed to a global condition in the form of a typically intractable integral equation. While checking the local condition is routine in the simplest scenarios, this proves much more difficult for complicated applications involving auxiliary structures and variables. Our aim is to develop a framework making establishing correctness of complex Markov chain Monte Carlo kernels a purely mechanical or algebraic exercise, while making communication of ideas simpler and unambiguous by allowing a stronger focus on essential features -- a choice of embedding distribution, an involution and occasionally an acceptance function -- rather than the induced, boilerplate structure of the kernels that often tends to obscure what is important. This framework can also be used to validate kernels that do not satisfy detailed balance, i.e. which are not reversible, but a modified version thereof.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024GIST: Gibbs self-tuning for locally adaptive Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 9
- 2022Recursive Monte Carlo and Variational Inference with Auxiliary Variablescited by 8
- 2021Delayed rejection Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for sampling multiscale distributionscited by 7
- 2021Entropy-based adaptive Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 5
- 2023On the convergence of dynamic implementations of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and No U-Turn Samplerscited by 4
- 2024AutoStep: Locally adaptive involutive MCMCcited by 4
- 2024Mixing of the No-U-Turn Sampler and the Geometry of Gaussian Concentrationcited by 3
- 2025The Within-Orbit Adaptive Leapfrog No-U-Turn Samplercited by 2
- 2026LazyHMC: Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Simulation for Lazy, Infinite Dimensional Probabilistic Programscited by 0
- 2026LazyHMC: Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Simulation for Lazy, Infinite Dimensional Probabilistic Programs9 Aug 2026
- 2025The Within-Orbit Adaptive Leapfrog No-U-Turn Sampler23 Jun 2025
- 2024AutoStep: Locally adaptive involutive MCMC24 Oct 2024
- 2024Mixing of the No-U-Turn Sampler and the Geometry of Gaussian Concentration9 Oct 2024
- 2024GIST: Gibbs self-tuning for locally adaptive Hamiltonian Monte Carlo23 Apr 2024
- 2023On the convergence of dynamic implementations of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and No U-Turn Samplers7 Jul 2023
- 2022Recursive Monte Carlo and Variational Inference with Auxiliary Variables5 Mar 2022
- 2021Entropy-based adaptive Hamiltonian Monte Carlo27 Oct 2021
- 2021Delayed rejection Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for sampling multiscale distributions1 Oct 2021