Analysis of the Scalability of a Deep-Learning Network for Steganography "Into the Wild"
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Since the emergence of deep learning and its adoption in steganalysis fields, most of the reference articles kept using small to medium size CNN, and learn them on relatively small databases. Therefore, benchmarks and comparisons between different deep learning-based steganalysis algorithms, more precisely CNNs, are thus made on small to medium databases. This is performed without knowing: 1. if the ranking, with a criterion such as accuracy, is always the same when the database is larger, 2. if the efficiency of CNNs will collapse or not if the training database is a multiple of magnitude larger, 3. the minimum size required for a database or a CNN, in order to obtain a better result than a random guesser. In this paper, after a solid discussion related to the observed behaviour of CNNs as a function of their sizes and the database size, we confirm that the error's power-law also stands in steganalysis, and this in a border case, i.e. with a medium-size network, on a big, constrained and very diverse database.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
3 papers.
- 2021Universal Deep Network for Steganalysis of Color Image based on Channel Representationcited by 5
- 2022STD-NET: Search of Image Steganalytic Deep-learning Architecture via Hierarchical Tensor Decompositioncited by 0
- 2023Automatic coral reef fish identification and 3D measurement in the wildcited by 0
- 2023Automatic coral reef fish identification and 3D measurement in the wild12 Dec 2023
- 2022STD-NET: Search of Image Steganalytic Deep-learning Architecture via Hierarchical Tensor Decomposition12 Jun 2022
- 2021Universal Deep Network for Steganalysis of Color Image based on Channel Representation24 Nov 2021