Improved Segmentation and Detection Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted Brain Infarct Lesions with Synthetically Enhanced Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Purpose: To compare the segmentation and detection performance of a deep learning model trained on a database of human-labelled clinical diffusion-weighted (DW) stroke lesions to a model trained on the same database enhanced with synthetic DW stroke lesions. Methods: In this institutional review board approved study, a stroke database of 962 cases (mean age 65+/-17 years, 255 males, 449 scans with DW positive stroke lesions) and a normal database of 2,027 patients (mean age 38+/-24 years,1088 females) were obtained. Brain volumes with synthetic DW stroke lesions were produced by warping the relative signal increase of real strokes to normal brain volumes. A generic 3D U-Net was trained on four different databases to generate four different models: (a) 375 neuroradiologist-labeled clinical DW positive stroke cases(CDB);(b) 2,000 synthetic cases(S2DB);(c) CDB+2,000 synthetic cases(CS2DB); or (d) CDB+40,000 synthetic cases(CS40DB). The models were tested on 20%(n=192) of the cases of the stroke database, which were excluded from the training set. Segmentation accuracy was characterized using Dice score and lesion volume of the stroke segmentation, and statistical significance was tested using a paired, two-tailed, Student's t-test. Detection sensitivity and specificity was compared to three neuroradiologists. Results: The performance of the 3D U-Net model trained on the CS40DB(mean Dice 0.72) was better than models trained on the CS2DB (0.70,P <0.001) or the CDB(0.65,P<0.001). The deep learning model was also more sensitive (91%[89%-93%]) than each of the three human readers(84%[81%-87%],78%[75%-81%],and 79%[76%-82%]), but less specific(75%[72%-78%] vs for the three human readers (96%[94%-97%],92%[90%-94%] and 89%[86%-91%]). Conclusion: Deep learning training for segmentation and detection of DW stroke lesions was significantly improved by enhancing the training set with synthetic lesions.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022Generalizability of Machine Learning Models: Quantitative Evaluation of Three Methodological Pitfallscited by 12
- 2024A Robust Ensemble Algorithm for Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation: Generalizability and Clinical Utility Beyond the ISLES Challengecited by 8
- 2023A Two-Stage Generative Model with CycleGAN and Joint Diffusion for MRI-based Brain Tumor Detectioncited by 3
- 2024Pre-examinations Improve Automated Metastases Detection on Cranial MRIcited by 0
- 2024A Robust Ensemble Algorithm for Ischemic Stroke Lesion Segmentation: Generalizability and Clinical Utility Beyond the ISLES Challenge28 Mar 2024
- 2024Pre-examinations Improve Automated Metastases Detection on Cranial MRI13 Mar 2024
- 2023A Two-Stage Generative Model with CycleGAN and Joint Diffusion for MRI-based Brain Tumor Detection6 Nov 2023
- 2022Generalizability of Machine Learning Models: Quantitative Evaluation of Three Methodological Pitfalls1 Feb 2022