Robustness, Privacy, and Generalization of Adversarial Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial training can considerably robustify deep neural networks to resist adversarial attacks. However, some works suggested that adversarial training might comprise the privacy-preserving and generalization abilities. This paper establishes and quantifies the privacy-robustness trade-off and generalization-robustness trade-off in adversarial training from both theoretical and empirical aspects. We first define a notion, it robustified intensity to measure the robustness of an adversarial training algorithm. This measure can be approximate empirically by an asymptotically consistent empirical estimator, it empirical robustified intensity. Based on the robustified intensity, we prove that (1) adversarial training is (varepsilon, δ)-differentially private, where the magnitude of the differential privacy has a positive correlation with the robustified intensity; and (2) the generalization error of adversarial training can be upper bounded by an mathcal O(√log N/N) on-average bound and an mathcal O(1/√N) high-probability bound, both of which have positive correlations with the robustified intensity. Additionally, our generalization bounds do not explicitly rely on the parameter size which would be prohibitively large in deep learning. Systematic experiments on standard datasets, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, are in full agreement with our theories. The source code package is available at urlhttps://github.com/fshp971/RPG.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021Gradient Masking and the Underestimated Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy in Deep Learningcited by 13
- 2023Fast Propagation is Better: Accelerating Single-Step Adversarial Training via Sampling Subnetworkscited by 8
- 2023Probing the Transition to Dataset-Level Privacy in ML Models Using an Output-Specific and Data-Resolved Privacy Profilecited by 3
- 2023OmniForce: On Human-Centered, Large Model Empowered and Cloud-Edge Collaborative AutoML Systemcited by 2
- 2024Combining Machine Learning Defenses without Conflictscited by 2
- 2022Black-Box Generalization: Stability of Zeroth-Order Learningcited by 1
- 2022Exploring High-Order Structure for Robust Graph Structure Learningcited by 0
- 2025The Double-Edged Nature of the Rashomon Set for Trustworthy Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2025The Double-Edged Nature of the Rashomon Set for Trustworthy Machine Learning26 Nov 2025
- 2024Combining Machine Learning Defenses without Conflicts14 Nov 2024
- 2023Fast Propagation is Better: Accelerating Single-Step Adversarial Training via Sampling Subnetworks24 Oct 2023
- 2023Probing the Transition to Dataset-Level Privacy in ML Models Using an Output-Specific and Data-Resolved Privacy Profile27 Jun 2023
- 2023OmniForce: On Human-Centered, Large Model Empowered and Cloud-Edge Collaborative AutoML System1 Mar 2023
- 2022Exploring High-Order Structure for Robust Graph Structure Learning22 Mar 2022
- 2022Black-Box Generalization: Stability of Zeroth-Order Learning14 Feb 2022
- 2021Gradient Masking and the Underestimated Robustness Threats of Differential Privacy in Deep Learning17 May 2021