Evolution Is All You Need: Phylogenetic Augmentation for Contrastive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-supervised representation learning of biological sequence embeddings alleviates computational resource constraints on downstream tasks while circumventing expensive experimental label acquisition. However, existing methods mostly borrow directly from large language models designed for NLP, rather than with bioinformatics philosophies in mind. Recently, contrastive mutual information maximization methods have achieved state-of-the-art representations for ImageNet. In this perspective piece, we discuss how viewing evolution as natural sequence augmentation and maximizing information across phylogenetic "noisy channels" is a biologically and theoretically desirable objective for pretraining encoders. We first provide a review of current contrastive learning literature, then provide an illustrative example where we show that contrastive learning using evolutionary augmentation can be used as a representation learning objective which maximizes the mutual information between biological sequences and their conserved function, and finally outline rationale for this approach.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Contrastive Representation Learning for 3D Protein Structurescited by 30
- 2025Hyperbolic Genome Embeddingscited by 3
- 2023Splicing Up Your Predictions with RNA Contrastive Learningcited by 0
- 2025Hyperbolic Genome Embeddings29 Jul 2025
- 2023Splicing Up Your Predictions with RNA Contrastive Learning12 Oct 2023
- 2022Contrastive Representation Learning for 3D Protein Structures31 May 2022