Identifying Invariant Texture Violation for Robust Deepfake Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing deepfake detection methods have reported promising in-distribution results, by accessing published large-scale dataset. However, due to the non-smooth synthesis method, the fake samples in this dataset may expose obvious artifacts (e.g., stark visual contrast, non-smooth boundary), which were heavily relied on by most of the frame-level detection methods above. As these artifacts do not come up in real media forgeries, the above methods can suffer from a large degradation when applied to fake images that close to reality. To improve the robustness for high-realism fake data, we propose the Invariant Texture Learning (InTeLe) framework, which only accesses the published dataset with low visual quality. Our method is based on the prior that the microscopic facial texture of the source face is inevitably violated by the texture transferred from the target person, which can hence be regarded as the invariant characterization shared among all fake images. To learn such an invariance for deepfake detection, our InTeLe introduces an auto-encoder framework with different decoders for pristine and fake images, which are further appended with a shallow classifier in order to separate out the obvious artifact-effect. Equipped with such a separation, the extracted embedding by encoder can capture the texture violation in fake images, followed by the classifier for the final pristine/fake prediction. As a theoretical guarantee, we prove the identifiability of such an invariance texture violation, i.e., to be precisely inferred from observational data. The effectiveness and utility of our method are demonstrated by promising generalization ability from low-quality images with obvious artifacts to fake images with high realism.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizoncited by 56
- 2021Towards Solving the DeepFake Problem : An Analysis on Improving DeepFake Detection using Dynamic Face Augmentationcited by 25
- 2024Deepfake Media Forensics: State of the Art and Challenges Aheadcited by 7
- 2021FFR_FD: Effective and Fast Detection of DeepFakes Based on Feature Point Defectscited by 1
- 2024Deepfake Media Forensics: State of the Art and Challenges Ahead1 Aug 2024
- 2021FFR_FD: Effective and Fast Detection of DeepFakes Based on Feature Point Defects5 Jul 2021
- 2021Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon27 Feb 2021
- 2021Towards Solving the DeepFake Problem : An Analysis on Improving DeepFake Detection using Dynamic Face Augmentation18 Feb 2021