Classification with Strategically Withheld Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning techniques can be useful in applications such as credit approval and college admission. However, to be classified more favorably in such contexts, an agent may decide to strategically withhold some of her features, such as bad test scores. This is a missing data problem with a twist: which data is missing em depends on the chosen classifier, because the specific classifier is what may create the incentive to withhold certain feature values. We address the problem of training classifiers that are robust to this behavior. We design three classification methods: sc Mincut, sc Hill-Climbing (sc HC) and Incentive-Compatible Logistic Regression (sc IC-LR). We show that sc Mincut is optimal when the true distribution of data is fully known. However, it can produce complex decision boundaries, and hence be prone to overfitting in some cases. Based on a characterization of truthful classifiers (i.e., those that give no incentive to strategically hide features), we devise a simpler alternative called sc HC which consists of a hierarchical ensemble of out-of-the-box classifiers, trained using a specialized hill-climbing procedure which we show to be convergent. For several reasons, sc Mincut and sc HC are not effective in utilizing a large number of complementarily informative features. To this end, we present sc IC-LR, a modification of Logistic Regression that removes the incentive to strategically drop features. We also show that our algorithms perform well in experiments on real-world data sets, and present insights into their relative performance in different settings.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022What Makes A Good Fisherman? Linear Regression under Self-Selection Biascited by 7
- 2024Classification Under Strategic Self-Selectioncited by 7
- 2022Strategic Representationcited by 4
- 2025Strategic Classification with Non-Linear Classifierscited by 4
- 2023Decongestion by Representation: Learning to Improve Economic Welfare in Marketplacescited by 3
- 2025Incentive-Aware Machine Learning; Robustness, Fairness, Improvement & Causalitycited by 3
- 2021Automated Mechanism Design for Classification with Partial Verificationcited by 2
- 2022I Prefer not to Say: Protecting User Consent in Models with Optional Personal Datacited by 1
- 2026Strategic Classification Has a Missing Lever: Audit Riskcited by 0
- 2026Strategic Classification Has a Missing Lever: Audit Risk18 Sep 2026
- 2025Strategic Classification with Non-Linear Classifiers29 May 2025
- 2025Incentive-Aware Machine Learning; Robustness, Fairness, Improvement & Causality8 May 2025
- 2024Classification Under Strategic Self-Selection23 Feb 2024
- 2023Decongestion by Representation: Learning to Improve Economic Welfare in Marketplaces18 Jun 2023
- 2022I Prefer not to Say: Protecting User Consent in Models with Optional Personal Data25 Oct 2022
- 2022Strategic Representation17 Jun 2022
- 2022What Makes A Good Fisherman? Linear Regression under Self-Selection Bias6 May 2022
- 2021Automated Mechanism Design for Classification with Partial Verification12 Apr 2021