Hierarchical principles of embodied reinforcement learning: A review
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cognitive Psychology and related disciplines have identified several critical mechanisms that enable intelligent biological agents to learn to solve complex problems. There exists pressing evidence that the cognitive mechanisms that enable problem-solving skills in these species build on hierarchical mental representations. Among the most promising computational approaches to provide comparable learning-based problem-solving abilities for artificial agents and robots is hierarchical reinforcement learning. However, so far the existing computational approaches have not been able to equip artificial agents with problem-solving abilities that are comparable to intelligent animals, including human and non-human primates, crows, or octopuses. Here, we first survey the literature in Cognitive Psychology, and related disciplines, and find that many important mental mechanisms involve compositional abstraction, curiosity, and forward models. We then relate these insights with contemporary hierarchical reinforcement learning methods, and identify the key machine intelligence approaches that realise these mechanisms. As our main result, we show that all important cognitive mechanisms have been implemented independently in isolated computational architectures, and there is simply a lack of approaches that integrate them appropriately. We expect our results to guide the development of more sophisticated cognitively inspired hierarchical methods, so that future artificial agents achieve a problem-solving performance on the level of intelligent animals.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
5 papers.
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,439
- 2025Multi-agent Embodied AI: Advances and Future Directionscited by 36
- 2022Online Damage Recovery for Physical Robots with Hierarchical Quality-Diversitycited by 7
- 2022Hierarchical Quality-Diversity for Online Damage Recoverycited by 5
- 2025Inducing, Detecting and Characterising Neural Modules: A Pipeline for Functional Interpretability in Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2025Multi-agent Embodied AI: Advances and Future Directions8 May 2025
- 2025Inducing, Detecting and Characterising Neural Modules: A Pipeline for Functional Interpretability in Reinforcement Learning28 Jan 2025
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey14 Sep 2023
- 2022Online Damage Recovery for Physical Robots with Hierarchical Quality-Diversity18 Oct 2022
- 2022Hierarchical Quality-Diversity for Online Damage Recovery12 Apr 2022