mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Molecular Dreaming: Inverse machine learning for de-novo molecular design and interpretability with surjective representations

arXiv 2012.09712 ↗First posted 17 Dec 2020cs.LG cs.AI physics.chem-phcited by 20

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computer-based de-novo design of functional molecules is one of the most prominent challenges in cheminformatics today. As a result, generative and evolutionary inverse designs from the field of artificial intelligence have emerged at a rapid pace, with aims to optimize molecules for a particular chemical property. These models 'indirectly' explore the chemical space; by learning latent spaces, policies, distributions or by applying mutations on populations of molecules. However, the recent development of the SELFIES string representation of molecules, a surjective alternative to SMILES, have made possible other potential techniques. Based on SELFIES, we therefore propose PASITHEA, a direct gradient-based molecule optimization that applies inceptionism techniques from computer vision. PASITHEA exploits the use of gradients by directly reversing the learning process of a neural network, which is trained to predict real-valued chemical properties. Effectively, this forms an inverse regression model, which is capable of generating molecular variants optimized for a certain property. Although our results are preliminary, we observe a shift in distribution of a chosen property during inverse-training, a clear indication of PASITHEA's viability. A striking property of inceptionism is that we can directly probe the model's understanding of the chemical space it was trained on. We expect that extending PASITHEA to larger datasets, molecules and more complex properties will lead to advances in the design of new functional molecules as well as the interpretation and explanation of machine learning models.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 6; 2023: 7; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

20 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022SELFIES and the future of molecular string representationscited by 76
  2. 2022On scientific understanding with artificial intelligencecited by 68
  3. 2022Regression Transformer: Concurrent sequence regression and generation for molecular language modelingcited by 49
  4. 2022Reinforced Genetic Algorithm for Structure-based Drug Designcited by 46
  5. 2022LIMO: Latent Inceptionism for Targeted Molecule Generationcited by 40
  6. 2023Searching for High-Value Molecules Using Reinforcement Learning and Transformerscited by 18
  7. 2021Assigning Confidence to Molecular Property Predictioncited by 14
  8. 2023Recent advances in the Self-Referencing Embedding Strings (SELFIES) librarycited by 8
  9. 2024Structure-based Drug Design Benchmark: Do 3D Methods Really Dominate?cited by 7
  10. 2023Explainability Techniques for Chemical Language Modelscited by 6
  11. 2023Deep Quantum Graph Dreaming: Deciphering Neural Network Insights into Quantum Experimentscited by 5
  12. 2022Quantum Deep Dreaming: A Novel Approach for Quantum Circuit Designcited by 3
8 more
  1. 2023Molecular De Novo Design through Transformer-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  2. 2026Beyond Affinity: A Benchmark of 1D, 2D, and 3D Methods Reveals Critical Trade-offs in Structure-Based Drug Designcited by 2
  3. 2021An In-depth Summary of Recent Artificial Intelligence Applications in Drug Designcited by 1
  4. 2023Will More Expressive Graph Neural Networks do Better on Generative Tasks?cited by 1
  5. 2024Using GNN property predictors as molecule generatorscited by 1
  6. 2023Transferable Graph Neural Fingerprint Models for Quick Response to Future Bio-Threatscited by 0
  7. 2024Quantum-inspired Reinforcement Learning for Synthesizable Drug Designcited by 0
  8. 2025Neural surrogates for designing gravitational wave detectorscited by 0