mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control with Posterior Sampling

arXiv 2012.09613 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2020cs.LGcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Balancing exploration and exploitation is crucial in reinforcement learning (RL). In this paper, we study model-based posterior sampling for reinforcement learning (PSRL) in continuous state-action spaces theoretically and empirically. First, we show the first regret bound of PSRL in continuous spaces which is polynomial in the episode length to the best of our knowledge. With the assumption that reward and transition functions can be modeled by Bayesian linear regression, we develop a regret bound of tildeO(H3/2d√T), where H is the episode length, d is the dimension of the state-action space, and T indicates the total time steps. This result matches the best-known regret bound of non-PSRL methods in linear MDPs. Our bound can be extended to nonlinear cases as well with feature embedding: using linear kernels on the feature representation φ, the regret bound becomes tildeO(H3/2dφ√T), where dφ is the dimension of the representation space. Moreover, we present MPC-PSRL, a model-based posterior sampling algorithm with model predictive control for action selection. To capture the uncertainty in models, we use Bayesian linear regression on the penultimate layer (the feature representation layer φ) of neural networks. Empirical results show that our algorithm achieves the state-of-the-art sample efficiency in benchmark continuous control tasks compared to prior model-based algorithms, and matches the asymptotic performance of model-free algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 7; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022POEM: Out-of-Distribution Detection with Posterior Samplingcited by 108
  2. 2024A Single Goal is All You Need: Skills and Exploration Emerge from Contrastive RL without Rewards, Demonstrations, or Subgoalscited by 23
  3. 2023Posterior Sampling for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 16
  4. 2023Model-Based Uncertainty in Value Functionscited by 15
  5. 2022When to Update Your Model: Constrained Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
  6. 2022Posterior Coreset Construction with Kernelized Stein Discrepancy for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  7. 2023Improved Bayesian Regret Bounds for Thompson Sampling in Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
  8. 2025The Sample Complexity of Online Reinforcement Learning: A Multi-model Perspectivecited by 6
  9. 2023STEERING: Stein Information Directed Exploration for Model-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
  10. 2023Posterior Sampling with Delayed Feedback for Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 3
  11. 2023Model-Based Epistemic Variance of Values for Risk-Aware Policy Optimizationcited by 3
  12. 2023Efficient Online Decision Tree Learning with Active Feature Acquisitioncited by 2
9 more
  1. 2024FlowRL: Flow-Augmented Few-Shot Reinforcement Learning for Semi-Structured Sensor Datacited by 2
  2. 2025Provable Anytime Ensemble Sampling Algorithms in Nonlinear Contextual Banditscited by 2
  3. 2026Posterior Sampling Reinforcement Learning with Gaussian Processes for Continuous Control: Sublinear Regret Bounds for Unbounded State Spacescited by 2
  4. 2024Isoperimetry is All We Need: Langevin Posterior Sampling for RL with Sublinear Regretcited by 1
  5. 2025Q-learning with Posterior Samplingcited by 1
  6. 2026Debiased Model-based Representations for Sample-efficient Continuous Controlcited by 1
  7. 2024Thompson Sampling for Infinite-Horizon Discounted Decision Processescited by 0
  8. 2025Leveraging priors on distribution functions for multi-arm banditscited by 0
  9. 2026Minimax-Optimality of Posterior Sampling for Reinforcement Learningcited by 0