On the Limitations of Denoising Strategies as Adversarial Defenses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As adversarial attacks against machine learning models have raised increasing concerns, many denoising-based defense approaches have been proposed. In this paper, we summarize and analyze the defense strategies in the form of symmetric transformation via data denoising and reconstruction (denoted as F+ inverse F, F-IF Framework). In particular, we categorize these denoising strategies from three aspects (i.e. denoising in the spatial domain, frequency domain, and latent space, respectively). Typically, defense is performed on the entire adversarial example, both image and perturbation are modified, making it difficult to tell how it defends against the perturbations. To evaluate the robustness of these denoising strategies intuitively, we directly apply them to defend against adversarial noise itself (assuming we have obtained all of it), which saving us from sacrificing benign accuracy. Surprisingly, our experimental results show that even if most of the perturbations in each dimension is eliminated, it is still difficult to obtain satisfactory robustness. Based on the above findings and analyses, we propose the adaptive compression strategy for different frequency bands in the feature domain to improve the robustness. Our experiment results show that the adaptive compression strategies enable the model to better suppress adversarial perturbations, and improve robustness compared with existing denoising strategies.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022Reverse Engineering of Imperceptible Adversarial Image Perturbationscited by 17
- 2023Adversarial Examples Might be Avoidable: The Role of Data Concentration in Adversarial Robustnesscited by 11
- 2021RAILS: A Robust Adversarial Immune-inspired Learning Systemcited by 8
- 2022Reverse Engineering ℓp attacks: A block-sparse optimization approach with recovery guaranteescited by 4
- 2022Hindering Adversarial Attacks with Implicit Neural Representationscited by 3
- 2024A Random Ensemble of Encrypted Vision Transformers for Adversarially Robust Defensecited by 3
- 2023Hindering Adversarial Attacks with Multiple Encrypted Patch Embeddingscited by 2
- 2021Dual Head Adversarial Trainingcited by 1
- 2023Efficient Key-Based Adversarial Defense for ImageNet by Using Pre-trained Modelcited by 1
- 2024A Random Ensemble of Encrypted Vision Transformers for Adversarially Robust Defense11 Feb 2024
- 2023Efficient Key-Based Adversarial Defense for ImageNet by Using Pre-trained Model28 Nov 2023
- 2023Adversarial Examples Might be Avoidable: The Role of Data Concentration in Adversarial Robustness28 Sep 2023
- 2023Hindering Adversarial Attacks with Multiple Encrypted Patch Embeddings4 Sep 2023
- 2022Hindering Adversarial Attacks with Implicit Neural Representations22 Oct 2022
- 2022Reverse Engineering of Imperceptible Adversarial Image Perturbations26 Mar 2022
- 2022Reverse Engineering ℓp attacks: A block-sparse optimization approach with recovery guarantees9 Mar 2022
- 2021RAILS: A Robust Adversarial Immune-inspired Learning System27 Jun 2021
- 2021Dual Head Adversarial Training21 Apr 2021