mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Costs to Consider in Adopting NLP for Your Business

arXiv 2012.08958 ↗First posted 16 Dec 2020cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP) have largely pushed deep transformer-based models as the go-to state-of-the-art technique without much regard to the production and utilization cost. Companies planning to adopt these methods into their business face difficulties because of the lack of machine, data, and human resources to build them. We compare both the performance and the cost of classical learning algorithms to the latest ones in common sequence and text labeling tasks. In our industrial datasets, we find that classical models often perform on par with deep neural ones despite the lower cost. We show the trade-off between performance gain and the cost across the models to give more insights for AI-pivoting business. Further, we call for more research into low-cost models, especially for under-resourced languages.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Dec 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 1.

3 papers.