A Study of Condition Numbers for First-Order Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The study of first-order optimization algorithms (FOA) typically starts with assumptions on the objective functions, most commonly smoothness and strong convexity. These metrics are used to tune the hyperparameters of FOA. We introduce a class of perturbations quantified via a new norm, called *-norm. We show that adding a small perturbation to the objective function has an equivalently small impact on the behavior of any FOA, which suggests that it should have a minor impact on the tuning of the algorithm. However, we show that smoothness and strong convexity can be heavily impacted by arbitrarily small perturbations, leading to excessively conservative tunings and convergence issues. In view of these observations, we propose a notion of continuity of the metrics, which is essential for a robust tuning strategy. Since smoothness and strong convexity are not continuous, we propose a comprehensive study of existing alternative metrics which we prove to be continuous. We describe their mutual relations and provide their guaranteed convergence rates for the Gradient Descent algorithm accordingly tuned. Finally we discuss how our work impacts the theoretical understanding of FOA and their performances.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2021Activated Gradients for Deep Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2022An Exponentially Converging Particle Method for the Mixed Nash Equilibrium of Continuous Gamescited by 14
- 2022On the Convergence of AdaGrad(Norm) on Rd: Beyond Convexity, Non-Asymptotic Rate and Accelerationcited by 13
- 2024Understanding Adam Requires Better Rotation Dependent Assumptionscited by 10
- 2025Model Immunization from a Condition Number Perspectivecited by 8
- 2023No Wrong Turns: The Simple Geometry Of Neural Networks Optimization Pathscited by 7
- 2025New Perspectives on the Polyak Stepsize: Surrogate Functions and Negative Resultscited by 6
- 2026In-Expectation Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Methods under Heavy-Tailed Noisecited by 2
- 2024Solving Hidden Monotone Variational Inequalities with Surrogate Lossescited by 1
- 2025Convergence Properties of Natural Gradient Descent for Minimizing KL Divergencecited by 0
- 2026In-Expectation Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Methods under Heavy-Tailed Noise30 May 2026
- 2025Model Immunization from a Condition Number Perspective29 May 2025
- 2025New Perspectives on the Polyak Stepsize: Surrogate Functions and Negative Results26 May 2025
- 2025Convergence Properties of Natural Gradient Descent for Minimizing KL Divergence27 Apr 2025
- 2024Solving Hidden Monotone Variational Inequalities with Surrogate Losses7 Nov 2024
- 2024Understanding Adam Requires Better Rotation Dependent Assumptions25 Oct 2024
- 2023No Wrong Turns: The Simple Geometry Of Neural Networks Optimization Paths20 Jun 2023
- 2022An Exponentially Converging Particle Method for the Mixed Nash Equilibrium of Continuous Games2 Nov 2022
- 2022On the Convergence of AdaGrad(Norm) on Rd: Beyond Convexity, Non-Asymptotic Rate and Acceleration29 Sep 2022
- 2021Activated Gradients for Deep Neural Networks9 Jul 2021